IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v153y2019i4d10.1007_s10584-019-02404-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Looking to the future: guidelines for decision support as adaptation practice matures

Author

Listed:
  • Jean P. Palutikof

    (Griffith University)

  • Roger B. Street

    (Oxford University)

  • Edward P. Gardiner

    (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration)

Abstract

In this final paper, the guest editors identify and discuss ten guidelines emerging from the papers in this Special Issue on Decision-Support Tools for Climate Change Adaptation. The guidelines are arranged under three headings: foundational, design and construction, and supporting sustainability in the long term. Under foundational, we address the need for co-operation with end users of decision-support resources, the contribution these resources can make to the formation of thriving communities of practice, and the match between the different types of decision support and user needs. Under design and construction, we point to the risk that policy settings will change over the multiple years required to build and publish complex decision-support resources, reducing the relevance of the final product. We discuss the need for innovative approaches to ensure visibility, credibility and hence uptake. Developers should be mindful of the requirements, resources and capabilities of potential users at all points in the design and build. We also suggest that decision-support resources may be transferable between sectors and locations, but the motivation should be around achieving excellence, and not just cost savings. Under supporting sustainability in the long term, we stress the need for evaluation and comparative studies of performance, leading to carefully documented updating and improvement of decision-support resources. Finally, in the conclusions, we look to the future. Can decision-support resources evolve successfully to meet the information and guidance requirements of the increasingly sophisticated adaptation practitioner community?

Suggested Citation

  • Jean P. Palutikof & Roger B. Street & Edward P. Gardiner, 2019. "Looking to the future: guidelines for decision support as adaptation practice matures," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 643-655, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:153:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10584-019-02404-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-019-02404-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-019-02404-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-019-02404-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elvis Modikela Nkoana & Aviel Verbruggen & Jean Hugé, 2018. "Climate Change Adaptation Tools at the Community Level: An Integrated Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Clemens Haße & Christian Kind, 2019. "Updating an existing online adaptation support tool: insights from an evaluation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 559-567, April.
    3. Hartmut Fünfgeld & Kate Lonsdale & Karyn Bosomworth, 2019. "Beyond the tools: supporting adaptation when organisational resources and capacities are in short supply," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 625-641, April.
    4. Roger B. Street & Patrick Pringle & Tiago Capela Lourenço & Mariana Nicolletti, 2019. "Transferability of decision-support tools," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 523-538, April.
    5. Rahel Laudien & Eva Boon & Hasse Goosen & Kim Nieuwaal, 2019. "The Dutch adaptation web portal: seven lessons learnt from a co-production point of view," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 509-521, April.
    6. Fahim Nawroz Tonmoy & David Rissik & J. P. Palutikof, 2019. "A three-tier risk assessment process for climate change adaptation at a local scale," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 539-557, April.
    7. Elvis Modikela Nkoana & Aviel Verbruggen & Jean Huge, 2018. "Climate change adaptation tools at the community level: An integrated literature review," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/269477, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrea De Montis & Antonio Ledda & Vittorio Serra & Giovanna Calia, 2024. "Green Infrastructure and Adaptation to Climate Change in Marginal Areas: A Reference Scheme for Implementation Guidelines in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Britta Restemeyer & Floris C. Boogaard, 2020. "Potentials and Pitfalls of Mapping Nature-Based Solutions with the Online Citizen Science Platform ClimateScan," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean P. Palutikof & Roger B. Street & Edward P. Gardiner, 2019. "Decision support platforms for climate change adaptation: an overview and introduction," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 459-476, April.
    2. Catherine E. Lambert & Jason R. Holley & Katherine A. McComas & Natalie P. Snider & Grace K. Tucker, 2021. "Eroding Land and Erasing Place: A Qualitative Study of Place Attachment, Risk Perception, and Coastal Land Loss in Southern Louisiana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Khadka, Chiranjeewee & Aryal, Keshava Prasad & Edwards-Jonášová, Magda & Upadhyaya, Anju & Dhungana, Nabin & Cudlin, Pavel & Vacik, Harald, 2018. "Evaluating participatory techniques for adaptation to climate change: Nepal case study," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 73-82.
    4. Fahim Nawroz Tonmoy & David Rissik & J. P. Palutikof, 2019. "A three-tier risk assessment process for climate change adaptation at a local scale," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 539-557, April.
    5. Thomas H. Douthat & Fahmida Akhter & Rachelle Sanderson & Jerrod Penn, 2023. "Stakeholder Perceptions about Incorporating Externalities and Vulnerability into Benefit–Cost Analysis Tools for Watershed Flood Risk Mitigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, May.
    6. Gotor, E. & Nedumaran, S. & Cenacchi, N. & Tran, N. & Dunston, S. & Dermawan, A. & Wiberg, David & Tesfaye, K. & Mausch, K. & Langan, Simon, 2021. "Land and water systems: looking to the future and a more resilient and sustainable society and environment," IWMI Working Papers H050899, International Water Management Institute.
    7. Karly Bitsura-Meszaros & Erin Seekamp & Mae Davenport & Jordan W. Smith, 2019. "A PGIS-Based Climate Change Risk Assessment Process for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Dependent Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Marta Terrado & Luz Calvo & Isadora Christel, 2022. "Towards more effective visualisations in climate services: good practices and recommendations," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 1-26, May.
    9. Ibrahim, Nur Atirah & Wan Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah & Manan, Zainuddin Abdul & Mustaffa, Azizul Azri & Kidam, Kamarizan, 2022. "Risk matrix approach of extreme temperature and precipitation for renewable energy systems in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    10. Veruska Muccione & Julia Aguilera Rodriguez & Anna Scolobig & Rosie Witton & Johanna Zwahlen & Alex Mackey & Julia Barrott & Otto Simonett & Markus Stoffel & Simon K. Allen, 2024. "Trends in climate adaptation solutions for mountain regions," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(7), pages 1-22, October.
    11. Minyoung Kwon & Erwin Mlecnik, 2021. "Modular Web Portal Approach for Stimulating Home Renovation: Lessons from Local Authority Developments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:153:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10584-019-02404-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.