IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v146y2018i3d10.1007_s10584-015-1567-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new ensemble of GCM simulations to assess avoided impacts in a climate mitigation scenario

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin M. Sanderson

    (National Center for Atmospheric Research)

  • Keith W. Oleson

    (National Center for Atmospheric Research)

  • Warren G. Strand

    (National Center for Atmospheric Research)

  • Flavio Lehner

    (National Center for Atmospheric Research)

  • Brian C. O’Neill

    (National Center for Atmospheric Research)

Abstract

There is growing evidence that the role internal variability plays in our confidence in future climate projections has been under-appreciated in past assessments of model projections for the coming decades. In light of this, a 15 member ensemble has been produced to complement the existing 30 member “Large Ensemble” conducted with the Community Earth System Model (CESM). In contrast to the Large Ensemble, which explored the variability in RCP8.5, our new ensemble uses the moderate mitigation scenario represented by RCP4.5. By comparing outputs from these two ensembles, we assess at what point in the future the climates conditioned on the two scenarios will begin to significantly diverge. We find in general that while internal variability is a significant component of uncertainty for periods before 2050, there is evidence of a significantly increased risk of extreme warm events in some regions as early as 2030 in RCP8.5 relative to RCP4.5. Furthermore, the period 2061-2080 sees largely separate joint distributions of annual mean temperature and precipitation in most regions for the two ensembles. Hence, in the CESM’s representation of the Earth System for the latter portion of the 21st century, the range of climatic states which might be expected in the RCP8.5 scenario is significantly and detectably further removed from today’s climate state than the RCP4.5 scenario even in the presence of internal variability.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin M. Sanderson & Keith W. Oleson & Warren G. Strand & Flavio Lehner & Brian C. O’Neill, 2018. "A new ensemble of GCM simulations to assess avoided impacts in a climate mitigation scenario," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 146(3), pages 303-318, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:146:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-015-1567-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-015-1567-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-015-1567-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-015-1567-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:146:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-015-1567-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.