IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v135y2016i1d10.1007_s10584-015-1568-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Engagement in the Third U.S. National Climate Assessment: commitment, capacity, and communication for impact

Author

Listed:
  • Emily Cloyd

    (ICF International
    University Corporation for Atmospheric Research)

  • Susanne C. Moser

    (Susanne Moser Research & Consulting
    Stanford University)

  • Edward Maibach

    (George Mason University)

  • Julie Maldonado

    (University of California)

  • Tinqiao Chen

    (Michigan State University)

Abstract

The National Climate Assessment’s ability to support decision-making partly relies on engaging stakeholders throughout the assessment process. The guiding vision for the Third National Climate Assessment (NCA3) was for an inclusive, broad-based, and sustained process attentive to both the conduct of assessments and communication of findings. Such a process promotes dialogue between scientific experts, stakeholders, and decision-makers about what is important in a particular region or sector, the potential impacts of climate change, and possible responses. We sought to create actionable research and assessment products widely perceived as credible, salient, and legitimate. The process also sought to build capacity to conduct sustained assessments and use climate change information in decision-making processes. Here we describe how we pursued this stakeholder engagement vision during the planning, development, and release of NCA3. Through repeated opportunities for stakeholder. input, we ensured process transparency and inclusiveness in the framing of assessment and built human capital. We also increased connectivity among stakeholder organizations. By cultivating a network of collaborators who connected the NCA to other networks, the NCA3 engagement process laid the groundwork for a sustained assessment - which is envisaged to transition the traditional quadrennial assessment approach into a more dynamic and adaptive assessment process.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily Cloyd & Susanne C. Moser & Edward Maibach & Julie Maldonado & Tinqiao Chen, 2016. "Engagement in the Third U.S. National Climate Assessment: commitment, capacity, and communication for impact," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 39-54, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:135:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s10584-015-1568-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-015-1568-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-015-1568-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-015-1568-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brenda Ekwurzel & Peter Frumhoff & James McCarthy, 2011. "Climate uncertainties and their discontents: increasing the impact of assessments on public understanding of climate risks and choices," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 108(4), pages 791-802, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hauer, Mathew & Santos-Lozada, Alexis R, 2017. "Inaction on climate change projected to reduce European life expectancy," SocArXiv ngtxr, Center for Open Science.
    2. Mathew E. Hauer & Alexis R. Santos-Lozada, 2021. "Inaction on Climate Change Projected to Reduce European Life Expectancy," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 40(3), pages 629-638, June.
    3. Gillian L. Galford & Julie Nash & Alan K. Betts & Sam Carlson & Sarah Ford & Ann Hoogenboom & Deborah Markowitz & Andrew Nash & Elizabeth Palchak & Sarah Pears & Kristen L. Underwood, 2016. "Bridging the climate information gap: a framework for engaging knowledge brokers and decision makers in state climate assessments," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 383-395, October.
    4. Melissa Widhalm & Jeffrey S. Dukes, 2020. "Introduction to the Indiana Climate Change Impacts Assessment: overview of the process and context," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 163(4), pages 1869-1879, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Delali B. K. Dovie & Mawuli Dzodzomenyo & Daniel E. Dodor & Antwi-Boasiako Amoah & Daniel K. Twerefou & Samuel N. A. Codjoe & Raymond A. Kasei, 2020. "Multi-Vector Approach to Cities’ Transition to Low-Carbon Emission Developments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-14, July.
    2. P. Marijn Poortvliet & Meredith T. Niles & Jeroen A. Veraart & Saskia E. Werners & Fiona C. Korporaal & Bob C. Mulder, 2020. "Communicating Climate Change Risk: A Content Analysis of IPCC’s Summary for Policymakers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Katharine Jacobs & James Buizer, 2016. "Building community, credibility and knowledge: the third US National Climate Assessment," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 9-22, March.
    4. Emily Cloyd & Susanne Moser & Edward Maibach & Julie Maldonado & Tinqiao Chen, 2016. "Engagement in the Third U.S. National Climate Assessment: commitment, capacity, and communication for impact," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 39-54, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:135:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s10584-015-1568-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.