IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/chinre/v18y2025i1d10.1007_s12187-024-10198-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sharing, Comforting, and Helping in Middle Childhood: An Explorative Multimethod Study

Author

Listed:
  • Edoardo Saija

    (Sapienza University of Rome)

  • Susanna Pallini

    (University of Roma Tre)

  • Roberto Baiocco

    (Sapienza University of Rome)

  • Jessica Pistella

    (Sapienza University of Rome)

  • Salvatore Ioverno

    (University of Roma Tre)

Abstract

Previous studies focusing on prosocial strategies used by school-aged children often relied on laboratory methodologies. This research examines children’s responses to their peers’ experiences of sadness, exploring their real-life narratives using a mixed-method approach. Four hundred forty-five children (age range: 7–10; Mage = 8.89; SDage = 1.07; 53.9% female) were asked in class to write about an event in which a peer experienced sadness and how they behaved in response to such event (prosocial strategies). In addition, children were asked to rate the intensity of their sadness reaction and their levels of prosociality and empathy using self-report scales. This mixed-method approach allowed the combination of quantitative and qualitative information. Using thematic analysis, prosocial strategies were categorized into comforting, helping, sharing, and inaction; sad events were classified into relational issues, accidents/illness, frustrations, losses/difficult events, and non-identified. A MANCOVA was used to explore differences in sadness intensity, empathy, prosocial motivation across children using different prosocial strategies. Multinomial regression models were used to assess whether the use of specific prosocial strategies was linked to particular types of sad events, as well as to different levels of empathy and prosocial motivation. Children reported comforting as their most strategy for all events except accidents/illness. Although sharing was less frequently used, it emerged as the most used strategy in relational issues events. Helping was more prevalent during accidents/illness and relational issues events. Younger children were more likely not to adopt any prosocial behavior compared to their older, more empathic, and prosocial counterparts. These findings underscore the significance of sadness as a trigger for prosocial behaviors and the importance of recognizing context-specific prosocial strategies to foster social-emotional competence in children.

Suggested Citation

  • Edoardo Saija & Susanna Pallini & Roberto Baiocco & Jessica Pistella & Salvatore Ioverno, 2025. "Sharing, Comforting, and Helping in Middle Childhood: An Explorative Multimethod Study," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 18(1), pages 401-421, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:chinre:v:18:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12187-024-10198-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s12187-024-10198-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12187-024-10198-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12187-024-10198-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:chinre:v:18:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12187-024-10198-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.