IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/cejnor/v32y2024i1d10.1007_s10100-023-00839-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the capacity of paired comparison methods to aggregate rankings of separate groups

Author

Listed:
  • Éva Orbán-Mihálykó

    (University of Pannonia)

  • Csaba Mihálykó

    (University of Pannonia)

  • László Gyarmati

    (University of Pannonia)

Abstract

Ranking and rating methods have outstanding significance in sports, mainly due to their capacity to predict results. In this paper we turn to their capacity to aggregate separate groups’ rankings based on a small piece of information. We investigate under which conditions two or more separate groups can be trustworthily interwoven applying Thurstone motivated methods and an AHP based method. A theorem is proved which guarantees adequate unified ranking based on some links between the groups. We also analyse the robustness of the results.

Suggested Citation

  • Éva Orbán-Mihálykó & Csaba Mihálykó & László Gyarmati, 2024. "Evaluating the capacity of paired comparison methods to aggregate rankings of separate groups," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 32(1), pages 109-129, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:32:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10100-023-00839-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10100-023-00839-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10100-023-00839-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10100-023-00839-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:32:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10100-023-00839-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.