Author
Abstract
Productivity growth in the advanced economies has been slowing down for some time. This is surprising insofar as large-scale technological impulses are expected as a result of the digital revolution. An analysis for Germany points to significantly weakening productivity impulses from technological progress and in particular from capital formation. In order to understand the weaker capital stock effects, gross fixed capital formation is briefly examined according to different components. Starting from the established types of investment and capital, we discuss how the empirical coverage of capital as a production factor can be advanced. The focus is on a more broadly defined digital capital stock. Comprehensive indicators to describe the extent and development of the general digitization also offer conceptual starting points for defining and measuring digital capital. In this way, it could be possible to estimate what digital capital is actually available for domestic production, how it develops over time and, ultimately, what contributions to growth and productivity it makes. The paper lists a series of requirements necessary for an implementation. The dynamics of the capital stock depend on whether and to what extent current investments exceed retirements of fixed assets. In any case, rising investment per unit of labor does not necessarily indicate an increase in capital deepening. However, modern capital goods in particular are characterized by a high rate of innovation and correspondingly high retirements. This leads us to expect that even comparatively high investments based on a concept that has been comprehensively expanded in terms of digitization will not necessarily trigger correspondingly high capital stock and productivity impulses.
Suggested Citation
Michael Grömling & Thomas Niebel, 2024.
"Measuring the productivity effects of digital capital—a conceptual approach,"
AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer;Deutsche Statistische Gesellschaft - German Statistical Society, vol. 18(3), pages 319-335, December.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:astaws:v:18:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11943-025-00350-y
DOI: 10.1007/s11943-025-00350-y
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:astaws:v:18:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11943-025-00350-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.