Author
Listed:
- Claudia Rutherford
(University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology
University of Sydney, Sydney Nursing School, Cancer Nursing Research Unit (CNRU))
- Rachel Campbell
(University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology)
- Melissa Tinsley
(Agency for Clinical Innovation)
- Robyn Speerin
(Agency for Clinical Innovation)
- Linda Soars
(Western Sydney Local Health District)
- Anna Butcher
(Northern Sydney Local health District)
- Madeleine King
(University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology)
Abstract
Use of patient-reported measures (PRMs) in healthcare is increasing internationally. In New South Wales (NSW) Australia the implementation of a system-wide PRMs program is underway. This program is an enabler for value based healthcare. We report an evaluation (2015/16) of this program’s first year. We evaluated the program using mixed methods. People living with chronic conditions from 18 sites across NSW completed PROMIS10 at all sites; DASS21 and CAT administered at selected sites depending on patient cohorts. PRM completion rates and mean scores were calculated. Stakeholder interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. PRM completion rates were high at baseline (69%) but suboptimal at follow-up time-points. Mean scores indicated people with back pain had worse physical health and stress compared to those with other conditions. People with alcohol or drug problems had worse mental health, disease symptoms, depression and anxiety compared to other conditions. Stakeholders reported collection of PRMs could improve health outcomes for patients, enhance service delivery, and reduce avoidable hospital admissions. Routine collection and use of PRMs can be implemented across NSW care settings. Several challenges need to be overcome to realise the full benefits of the PRM program and to improve follow-up completion rates.
Suggested Citation
Claudia Rutherford & Rachel Campbell & Melissa Tinsley & Robyn Speerin & Linda Soars & Anna Butcher & Madeleine King, 2021.
"Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures into Clinical Practice Across NSW: Mixed Methods Evaluation of the First Year,"
Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(3), pages 1265-1284, June.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:ariqol:v:16:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11482-020-09817-2
DOI: 10.1007/s11482-020-09817-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ariqol:v:16:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11482-020-09817-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.