IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v7y2009i4p209-217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which barriers prevent the efficient use of resources in medical device sectors?

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Simoens

Abstract

This article aims to examine barriers to the efficient use of resources relating to medical devices, by focusing specifically on an economic analysis of the market structure of medical devices and on the assessment procedures for medical devices. A desktop analysis was conducted of the health economic literature relating to both of these aspects. This information was structured and analysed with a view to identifying and discussing the major issues that may threaten the efficient use of medical devices. Medical device sectors do not tend to operate as perfectly competitive markets because of the presence of heterogeneous products, information asymmetry and a restricted number of manufacturers. There is a need for government intervention to keep prices down, restrict public reimbursement and promote an efficient use of medical devices. Assessment procedures governing pricing and reimbursement of medical devices are lacking, are in development, or have only recently been established in the majority of developed countries. There is limited transparency and less formal attention of decision makers to assessment of the efficient use of resources in medical device sectors as compared with medicines. In conclusion, there is a need for more studies exploring the safety, effectiveness, cost effectiveness and budget impact of medical devices, so that decision makers can make informed pricing and reimbursement decisions based on objective analyses. Additionally, there is a need for more formal assessment systems for medical devices. Copyright Adis Data Information BV 2009

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Simoens, 2009. "Which barriers prevent the efficient use of resources in medical device sectors?," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 209-217, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:7:y:2009:i:4:p:209-217
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03256154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF03256154
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03256154?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gianluca Baio & Laura Magazzini & Claudia Oglialoro & Fabio Pammolli & Massimo Riccaboni, 2005. "Medical Devices: Competitiveness and Impact on Public Health Expenditure," Working Papers CERM 05-2005, Competitività, Regole, Mercati (CERM).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fischer, Katharina E. & Rogowski, Wolf H. & Leidl, Reiner & Stollenwerk, Björn, 2013. "Transparency vs. closed-door policy: Do process characteristics have an impact on the outcomes of coverage decisions? A statistical analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(3), pages 187-196.
    2. -, 2020. "Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean 2020," La Inversión Extranjera Directa en América Latina y el Caribe, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 46541 edited by Eclac.
    3. Gallego, Gisselle & Casey, Robert & Norman, Richard & Goodall, Stephen, 2011. "Introduction and uptake of new medical technologies in the Australian health care system: A qualitative study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 152-158.
    4. David McKernan & Olivia McDermott, 2022. "The Evolution of Ireland’s Medical Device Cluster and Its Future Direction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kurt Hornschild & Stephan Raab & Jörg-Peter Weiß, 2005. "Die Medizintechnik am Standort Deutschland: Chancen und Risiken durch technologische Innovationen, Auswirkungen auf und durch das nationale Gesundheitssystem sowie potentielle Wachstumsmärkte im Ausla," DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, edition 2, volume 10, number pbk10.
    2. Fabio Pammolli & Nicola Carmine Salerno, 2006. "Spesa sanitaria, demografia, governance istituzionale - Tra trend storici e proiezioni a lungo termine," Working Papers CERM 02-2006, Competitività, Regole, Mercati (CERM).
    3. G. Crea & A. Cavaliere & A. Cozzi, 2019. "Price discrimination in the Italian medical device industry: an empirical analysis," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 36(2), pages 571-608, July.
    4. Kamil Dybczak & Bartosz Przywara, 2010. "The role of technology in health care expenditure in the EU," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 400, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    5. Fabio Pammolli & Massimo Riccaboni & Laura Magazzini, 2012. "The sustainability of European health care systems: beyond income and aging," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 13(5), pages 623-634, October.
    6. Viktor Chuzhykov & Areg Movsesyan, 2020. "Peculiarities of the Ukrainian medical device market," Business Management, D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov, Bulgaria, issue 2 Year 20, pages 25-37.
    7. Shelley McDonough Kimelberg & Lauren A. Nicoll, 2012. "Business Location Decisions in the Medical Device Industry," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 26(1), pages 34-49, February.
    8. Martino Maggetti & Christian Ewert & Philipp Trein, 2017. "Not Quite the Same," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 670(1), pages 152-169, March.
    9. Elisabet Rodriguez Llorian & Janelle Mann, 2022. "Exploring the technology–healthcare expenditure nexus: a panel error correction approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 62(6), pages 3061-3086, June.
    10. Peter Willemé & Michel Dumont, 2016. "Machines that go ‘ping’: Medical Technology and Health Expenditures in OECD Countries," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(3), pages 387-388, March.
    11. D. Ackerly & Seth Glickman & Kevin Schulman, 2010. "Economic Content in Medical Journal Advertisements for Medical Devices and Prescription Drugs," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 429-438, May.
    12. Monica Plechero & Claudio Cozza & Raquel Ortega-Argiles, 2017. "European Disparities in Regional Health R&I Performance," Working Papers 13, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    13. Davide Consoli & Andrea Mina, 2009. "An evolutionary perspective on health innovation systems," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 297-319, April.
    14. Michel Dumont & Peter Willemé, 2013. "Working Paper 02-13 - Machines that go ‘ping’: medical technology and health expenditures in OECD countries," Working Papers 1302, Federal Planning Bureau, Belgium.
    15. Galizzi, Matteo M. & Miraldo, Marisa, 2011. "The effects of hospitals' governance on optimal contracts: Bargaining vs. contracting," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 408-424, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:7:y:2009:i:4:p:209-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.