IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v7y2009i1p19-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents compared with bare metal stents in acute myocardial infarction

Author

Listed:
  • Florence Canoui-Poitrine
  • Grégoire Jeanblanc
  • Corinne Alberti
  • Priscilla Armoogum
  • Ana Cebrian
  • Didier Carrié
  • Patrick Henry
  • Emmanuel Teiger
  • Michel Slama
  • Christian Spaulding
  • Isabelle Durand-Zaleski

Abstract

In this pre-specified subgroup analysis of the TYPHOON trial, the use of SES in patients with AMI with ST-segment elevation less than 12 hours after the onset of chest pain reduced the rate of TVR compared with BMS. However, SES had a debatable ICER for the payer if it was based only on the specific benefit of TVR avoided. Copyright Adis Data Information BV 2009

Suggested Citation

  • Florence Canoui-Poitrine & Grégoire Jeanblanc & Corinne Alberti & Priscilla Armoogum & Ana Cebrian & Didier Carrié & Patrick Henry & Emmanuel Teiger & Michel Slama & Christian Spaulding & Isabelle Dur, 2009. "Cost effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents compared with bare metal stents in acute myocardial infarction," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 19-29, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:7:y:2009:i:1:p:19-29
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03256139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF03256139
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03256139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Greenberg, Dan & Bakhai, Ameet & Neumann, Peter J. & Cohen, David J., 2004. "Willingness to pay for avoiding coronary restenosis and repeat revascularization: results from a contingent valuation study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 207-216, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pravesh Kumar Bundhun & Akash Bhurtu & Mohammad Zafooruddin Sani Soogund & Man-Yun Long, 2016. "Comparing the Clinical Outcomes between Drug Eluting Stents and Bare Metal Stents in Patients with Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 10 Randomized Cont," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tang, Chao-Hsiun & Liu, Jin-Tan & Chang, Ching-Wen & Chang, Wen-Ying, 2007. "Willingness to pay for drug abuse treatment: Results from a contingent valuation study in Taiwan," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 251-262, July.
    2. Daniel E. Jonas & Louise B. Russell & Jon Chou & Michael Pignone, 2010. "Willingness‐to‐pay to avoid the time spent and discomfort associated with screening colonoscopy," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(10), pages 1193-1211, October.
    3. María V. Avilés Blanco & Raúl Brey & Jorge Araña & José Luis Pinto Prades, 2018. "Emotions and scope effects in the monetary valuation of health," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(3), pages 315-325, April.
    4. Maria V. Aviles-Blanco, 2021. "Economic evaluation of process utility: elucidating preferences for a non-invasive procedure to treat restenosis," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:7:y:2009:i:1:p:19-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.