IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v23y2025i2d10.1007_s40258-025-00946-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health Economic Evaluations of Obesity Interventions: Expert Views on How We Can Identify, Interpret, Analyse and Translate Effects

Author

Listed:
  • Samira B. Jabakhanji

    (Heidelberg University
    RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences)

  • Gintare Valentelyte

    (RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences)

  • Fabian Manke-Reimers

    (Heidelberg University)

  • Vidar Halsteinli

    (Norwegian University of Science and Technology)

  • Rønnaug Ødegård

    (Norwegian University of Science and Technology
    Trondheim University Hospital)

  • Adam Martin

    (University of Leeds)

  • Grace O’Malley

    (RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences
    Children’s Health Ireland at Temple Street)

  • Jan Sorensen

    (RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences)

  • Emilia Hagman

    (Karolinska Institutet)

Abstract

Economic evaluations of obesity interventions are critical to informing policymakers and clinical practitioners about best-value prevention and treatment interventions. However, existing studies often fail to measure appropriate outcomes over sufficient time periods and to adequately address the complexity of data, environments and outcomes. An international, multidisciplinary workshop in Ireland (May 2023) addressed these issues through scientific presentations on obesity modelling, group discussions and interactive small-group exercises. Nineteen presenters and participants co-created a list of research needs, priorities and strategies for the long-term study of obesity and its complications. To support availability of relevant outcome and cost data for health economic analyses, participants highlighted a need to define standards for data collection, data sharing, modelling, and integrating a systems perspective. For example, regarding data collection, careful consideration must be given to selecting valid and relevant health-related outcomes for determining future health risk. Although these issues have been previously highlighted, they remain critical barriers to comprehensive economic obesity studies. To identify best-value obesity interventions, researchers should prioritise strategies to overcome these barriers. This includes early engagement with multidisciplinary stakeholders to integrate diverse perspectives. Developing infrastructure to support international collaborations between researchers, policymakers and patient representatives was also recommended. Additionally, establishing best-practice guidelines could help researchers navigate the complexities of obesity data, environments and outcomes, particularly in data-scarce research environments. The creation of a core outcomes set for obesity would standardise measures for economic evaluations, thereby facilitating more robust cross-country comparisons of intervention effects and improving the evidence base and overall quality of future obesity research.

Suggested Citation

  • Samira B. Jabakhanji & Gintare Valentelyte & Fabian Manke-Reimers & Vidar Halsteinli & Rønnaug Ødegård & Adam Martin & Grace O’Malley & Jan Sorensen & Emilia Hagman, 2025. "Health Economic Evaluations of Obesity Interventions: Expert Views on How We Can Identify, Interpret, Analyse and Translate Effects," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 161-169, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:23:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s40258-025-00946-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-025-00946-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-025-00946-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-025-00946-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:23:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s40258-025-00946-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.