IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v23y2025i2d10.1007_s40258-024-00933-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost of Carbon in the Total Cost of a Healthcare Procedure: Example of Micro-Costing Study in a French Setting

Author

Listed:
  • Paul-Simon Pugliesi

    (William Morey Hospital
    William Morey Hospital)

  • Hervé Frick

    (William Morey Hospital)

  • Stéphanie Guillot

    (William Morey Hospital)

  • Karine Ferrare

    (William Morey Hospital)

  • Catherine Renzullo

    (Pharmacy, William Morey Hospital)

  • Alexandre Benoist

    (William Morey Hospital)

  • Serge Ribes

    (William Morey Hospital)

  • Guillaume Beltramo

    (INSERM U1231
    Dijon University Hospital)

  • Thomas Maldiney

    (William Morey Hospital
    INSERM)

  • Romain Schiphorst

    (William Morey Hospital)

  • Caroline Abdul Malak

    (William Morey Hospital)

  • Adrien Bevand

    (William Morey Hospital)

  • Laurie Marrauld

    (University of Rennes, EHESP, CNRS, Inserm, Arènes – UMR 6051, RSMS (Health Services and Management Research) – U 1309)

  • Catherine Lejeune

    (CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Inserm, Université de Bourgogne, CIC 1432, Module Épidémiologie Clinique)

Abstract

Background Economic evaluation aims to compare the costs and results of health strategies to inform public decision making. Although sometimes suggested, until now no national evaluation agency has recommended formally incorporating the cost of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated by health interventions into the estimation of healthcare costs. Objective The objective of this study was to test and discuss the feasibility of estimating and including the contribution of GHG emissions cost to the total cost of a surgical intervention, with the example of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RTA), using a micro-costing approach. Methods The study was conducted in June 2022 at the William Morey Hospital (France). Data regarding all of the resources (labor, medical equipment, consumables), as well as energy consumption, staff commuting and waste treatment were collected and valued from the hospital point of view. Greenhouse gas emissions were valued using a cost-effectiveness approach. Several sensitivity analyses were performed. Results The mean cost per patient of an RTA was estimated to be €4755.65, of which €152.64 (3.21 %) would be attributable to GHG emissions. The contribution of GHG emissions in the overall cost of a health intervention was highly dependent on the convention used for the price of carbon. Conclusion Despite persistent theoretical and practical challenges, adding the estimation of GHG emission costs in the economic evaluation of health interventions may provide institutional decision makers with information that allows them to allocate the public healthcare resources more efficiently.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul-Simon Pugliesi & Hervé Frick & Stéphanie Guillot & Karine Ferrare & Catherine Renzullo & Alexandre Benoist & Serge Ribes & Guillaume Beltramo & Thomas Maldiney & Romain Schiphorst & Caroline Abdu, 2025. "Cost of Carbon in the Total Cost of a Healthcare Procedure: Example of Micro-Costing Study in a French Setting," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 265-275, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:23:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s40258-024-00933-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-024-00933-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-024-00933-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-024-00933-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • Q52 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:23:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s40258-024-00933-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.