IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v22y2024i6d10.1007_s40258-024-00898-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-Utility Analysis of TNF-α Inhibitors, B Cell Inhibitors, and JAK Inhibitors Versus csDMARDs for Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Madhumitha Haridoss

    (ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology
    SRM Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, SRM Institute of Science and Technology)

  • Akhil Sasidharan

    (ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology)

  • Sajith Kumar

    (ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology)

  • Kavitha Rajsekar

    (MoHFW, GOI)

  • Krishnamurthy Venkataraman

    (Chennai Meenakshi Multispeciality Hospital)

  • Bhavani Shankara Bagepally

    (ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology)

Abstract

Introduction Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a progressive and debilitating disease, causing persistent joint pain that limits daily activities requiring long-term treatment. Newer targeted therapies expand RA treatment options, but their high cost necessitates a focus on cost effectiveness. To address this, we aim to conduct a cost-utility analysis of these newer RA pharmacotherapies to support evidence-based policy decision-making. Methods We analyzed the cost-utility of sequential treatment with TNF-α, B cell and JAK-inhibitors compared with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) for RA treatment in methotrexate (MTX) nonresponders. We used a Markov model with lifetime horizon and 6-month cycles from an Indian health system perspective. Costs (INR 2022) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were used to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) at a cost-effectiveness threshold of India’s gross domestic product (GDP) per capita (2022). We assessed uncertainty using univariate, probabilistic sensitivity, and scenario analyses. Results Despite additional QALYs, TNF-α, B cell, and JAK inhibitors were not cost-effective for treating moderate-to-severe patients with RA unresponsive to csDMARDs (including MTX) in India, as increased costs outweighed their clinical benefits. ICERs ranged from 10,46,206 to 31,09,207 Indian Rupees in the base case analysis, exceeding three times India’s GDP per-capita [approximately USD $13,287 to $39,487 and GBP £10,776 to £32,025]. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the results’ robustness. Scenario analysis suggested that a cost reduction of over 75% in drug prices could make most of the interventions cost effective compared with csDMARDs. Conclusions TNF-α, B cell, and JAK-inhibitors are not cost-effective compared with csDMARDs for patients with RA who have not responded to MTX in India at the current prices. Cost-effectiveness estimates were highly influenced by drug pricing variations. Therefore, reducing the prices of these interventions could enhance affordability, potentially leading to their inclusion in publicly funded health programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Madhumitha Haridoss & Akhil Sasidharan & Sajith Kumar & Kavitha Rajsekar & Krishnamurthy Venkataraman & Bhavani Shankara Bagepally, 2024. "Cost-Utility Analysis of TNF-α Inhibitors, B Cell Inhibitors, and JAK Inhibitors Versus csDMARDs for Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 885-896, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:22:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s40258-024-00898-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-024-00898-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-024-00898-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-024-00898-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:22:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s40258-024-00898-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.