Author
Listed:
- Louisa G. Collins
(QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Royal Brisbane Hospital
The University of Queensland
Queensland University of Technology)
- Ryan Gage
(University of Otago Wellington)
- Craig Sinclair
(Cancer Council Victoria)
- Daniel Lindsay
(QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Royal Brisbane Hospital
The University of Queensland)
Abstract
Objective Preventing the onset of skin malignancies is feasible by reducing exposure to ultraviolet radiation. We reviewed published economic evaluations of primary prevention initiatives in the past decade, to support investment decisions for skin cancer prevention. Methods We assessed cost-effectiveness, cost-utility and benefit-cost analyses published from 1 September 2013. Seven databases were searched on 18 July 2023 and updated on 15 November 2023. Studies must have reported outcomes in terms of monetary costs, life years, quality-adjusted life years or variant thereof. A narrative synthesis was undertaken and reporting quality was assessed by three reviewers using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist. Results In total, 12 studies were included with five studies located in Australia; three in North America and the remaining four in Europe. Interventions included restricting the use of indoor tanning devices (7 studies), television advertising, multi-component sun safety campaigns, shade structures plus protective clothing provision for outdoor workers and provision of melanoma genomic risk information to individuals. Most studies constructed Markov cohort models and adopted a societal cost perspective. Overall, the reporting quality of the studies was high. Studies found highly favourable returns on investment ranging from US$0.35 for every $1 spent on prevention, up to €3.60 for every €1 spent. Other studies showed substantial skin cancers avoided, gains in life years, quality-adjusted survival, and societal cost savings. Conclusions From both population health and economic perspectives, allocating limited health care resources to primary prevention of skin cancer is highly favourable.
Suggested Citation
Louisa G. Collins & Ryan Gage & Craig Sinclair & Daniel Lindsay, 2024.
"The Cost-Effectiveness of Primary Prevention Interventions for Skin Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review,"
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 685-700, September.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:22:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s40258-024-00892-2
DOI: 10.1007/s40258-024-00892-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:22:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s40258-024-00892-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.