IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v22y2024i4d10.1007_s40258-024-00885-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurement of Catastrophic Health Expenditure in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Umenthala Srikanth Reddy

    (International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS))

Abstract

Introduction The escalating burden of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) poses a significant threat to individuals and households in India, where out-of-pocket expenditure (OOP) constitutes a substantial portion of healthcare financing. With rising OOP in India, a proper measurement to track and monitor CHE due to health expenditure is of utmost important. This study focuses on synthesizing findings, understanding measurement variations, and estimating the pooled incidence of CHE by health services, reported diseases, and survey types. Method Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a thorough search strategy was employed across multiple databases, between 2010 and 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed observational or interventional studies reporting CHE incidence, while exclusion criteria screened out studies with unclear definitions, pharmacy revenue-based spending, or non-representative health facility surveys. A meta-analysis, utilizing a random-effects model, assessed the pooled CHE incidence. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analyses were conducted to explore heterogeneity. Results Out of 501 initially relevant articles, 36 studies met inclusion criteria. The review identified significant variations in CHE measurements, with incidence ranging from 5.1% to 69.9%. Meta-analysis indicated the estimated incidence of CHE at a 10% threshold is 0.30 [0.25–0.35], indicating a significant prevalence of financial hardship due to health expenses. The pooled incidence is estimated by considering different sub-groups. No statistical differences were found between inpatient and outpatient CHE. However, disease-specific estimates were significantly higher (52%) compared to combined diseases (21%). Notably, surveys focusing on health reported higher CHE (33%) than consumption surveys (14%). Discussion The study highlights the intricate challenges in measuring CHE, emphasizing variations in recall periods, components considered in out-of-pocket expenditure, and diverse methods for defining capacity to pay. Notably, the findings underscore the need for standardized definitions and measurements across studies. The lack of uniformity in reporting exacerbates the challenge of comparing and comprehensively understanding the financial burden on households.

Suggested Citation

  • Umenthala Srikanth Reddy, 2024. "Measurement of Catastrophic Health Expenditure in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 471-483, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:22:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s40258-024-00885-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-024-00885-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-024-00885-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-024-00885-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arindam Nandi & Ashvin Ashok & Ramanan Laxminarayan, 2013. "The Socioeconomic and Institutional Determinants of Participation in India’s Health Insurance Scheme for the Poor," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dayashankar Maurya, 2019. "Understanding public health insurance in India: A design perspective," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 1633-1650, October.
    2. Anaka Aiyar & Naveen Sunder, 2024. "Health insurance and child mortality: Evidence from India," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), pages 870-893, May.
    3. Sulakshana Nandi & Helen Schneider & Priyanka Dixit, 2017. "Hospital utilization and out of pocket expenditure in public and private sectors under the universal government health insurance scheme in Chhattisgarh State, India: Lessons for universal health cover," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Manini Ojha, 2022. "Gender gap in schooling: Is there a role for health insurance?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 29-54, January.
    5. Shankar Prinja & Akashdeep Singh Chauhan & Anup Karan & Gunjeet Kaur & Rajesh Kumar, 2017. "Impact of Publicly Financed Health Insurance Schemes on Healthcare Utilization and Financial Risk Protection in India: A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, February.
    6. O'Donnell, Owen, 2024. "Health and health system effects on poverty: A narrative review of global evidence," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    7. Milind Kumar Yadav & Pratap C. Mohanty, 2021. "Determinants of choice of health insurance: Empirical evidence from responses of Indian households," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 1809-1829, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:22:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s40258-024-00885-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.