IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v22y2024i4d10.1007_s40258-024-00876-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost of Low-Value Imaging Worldwide: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Elin Kjelle

    (Gjøvik at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at Gjøvik)

  • Ingrid Øfsti Brandsæter

    (Gjøvik at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at Gjøvik)

  • Eivind Richter Andersen

    (Gjøvik at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at Gjøvik)

  • Bjørn Morten Hofmann

    (Gjøvik at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at Gjøvik
    Centre of Medical Ethics at the University of Oslo)

Abstract

Background and Objective Imaging with low or no benefit for the patient undermines the quality of care and amounts to vast opportunity costs. More than 3.6 billion imaging examinations are performed annually, and about 20–50% of these are of low value. This study aimed to synthesize knowledge of the costs of low-value imaging worldwide. Methods This systematic review was based on the PRISMA statement. The database search was developed in Medline and further adapted to Embase-Ovid, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. Primary empirical studies assessing the costs of low-value diagnostic imaging were included if published between 2012 and March 2022. Studies designed as randomized controlled trials, non-randomized trials, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, descriptive studies, cost analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis, and mixed-methods studies were eligible. The analysis was descriptive. Results Of 5,567 records identified, 106 were included. Most of the studies included were conducted in the USA (n = 76), and a hospital or medical center was the most common setting (n = 82). Thirty-eight of the included studies calculated the costs of multiple imaging modalities; in studies with only one imaging modality included, conventional radiography was the most common (n = 32). Aggregated costs for low-value examinations amounts to billions of dollars per year globally. Initiatives to reduce low-value imaging may reduce costs by up to 95% without harming patients. Conclusions This study is the first systematic review of the cost of low-value imaging worldwide, documenting a high potential for cost reduction. Given the universal challenges with resource allocation, the large amount used for low-value imaging represents a vast opportunity cost and offers great potential to improve the quality and efficiency of care.

Suggested Citation

  • Elin Kjelle & Ingrid Øfsti Brandsæter & Eivind Richter Andersen & Bjørn Morten Hofmann, 2024. "Cost of Low-Value Imaging Worldwide: A Systematic Review," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 485-501, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:22:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s40258-024-00876-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-024-00876-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-024-00876-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-024-00876-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nader Jahanmehr & Atieh Sadat Bigdeli & Hedayat Salari & Hussein Mokarami & Soheila KhodaKarim & Soheila Damiri, 2019. "Analyzing inappropriate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prescriptions and resulting economic burden on patients suffering from back pain," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 1437-1447, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:22:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s40258-024-00876-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.