IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v21y2023i4d10.1007_s40258-023-00795-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review and Assessment of Policy Options for Improving Access to Combination Therapies in Oncology in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher H. Henshall
  • Dávid Dankó

    (Ideas & Solutions)

  • Leela Barham

    (Leela Barham Economic Consulting Ltd)

  • Jaime Espín

    (Andalusian School of Public Health)

  • Jorge Felix

    (Exigo)

  • Mary Harney
  • Peter Indra

    (Amt für Gesundheit)

  • Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz
  • Gérard Pouvourville

    (ESSEC Business School)

  • Federico Spandonaro

    (University San Raffaele)

  • Luka Vončina

    (University of Rijeka)

  • Nils Wilking

    (Karolinska Institutet)

Abstract

Objectives Combinations of on-patent therapies (CTs) are increasingly common in oncology. They cause challenges for funding and affordability, and hence patient access, especially when constituent therapies are owned by different manufacturers. The aim of our study was to develop policy proposals for the assessment, pricing, and funding of CTs and identify which might be relevant in different European countries. Methods Following a review of available literature, seven hypothetical policy proposals were developed and subsequently assessed through 19 semi-structured interviews with health policy, pricing, technology assessment and legal experts in seven European countries to identify those most likely to gain traction. Results Experts saw a need for agreed approaches within a country to manage affordability and funding challenges for CTs. Changes to health technology assessment (HTA) and funding models were considered unlikely, but other policy proposals were seen as mostly useful, with country-specific adaptations. Bilateral discussions between manufacturers and payers were deemed important, and less challenging and protracted than arbitrated dialogue between manufacturers. Usage-specific pricing, possibly using weighted average prices, was considered a prerequisite for the financial management of CTs. Conclusions There is a growing need to ensure that CTs are affordable to health systems. It would appear that there is no one set of policies that is appropriate for all countries in Europe, so countries wishing to ensure that patients have (or continue to have) access to CTs of value to them must explore and implement the policies that are best suited to their general approach to funding health care and to the assessment and reimbursement of medicines.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher H. Henshall & Dávid Dankó & Leela Barham & Jaime Espín & Jorge Felix & Mary Harney & Peter Indra & Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz & Gérard Pouvourville & Federico Spandonaro & Luka Vončina & Nils , 2023. "Review and Assessment of Policy Options for Improving Access to Combination Therapies in Oncology in Europe," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 537-546, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:21:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s40258-023-00795-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00795-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-023-00795-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-023-00795-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:21:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s40258-023-00795-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.