IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v19y2021i6d10.1007_s40258-021-00665-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Sandbox Approach and its Potential for Use in Health Technology Assessment: A Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Emily Leckenby

    (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE))

  • Dalia Dawoud

    (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE))

  • Jacoline Bouvy

    (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE))

  • Páll Jónsson

    (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE))

Abstract

Background The concept of the regulatory sandbox—a safe space for testing new regulatory processes—was first used within the financial technologies (FinTech) sector, but has since expanded into other sectors, including healthcare. Objectives This review aims to describe the extent of use of sandboxes in healthcare and assess the potential for the sandbox approach to be used to test and develop emerging health technology assessment (HTA) methods, policies and processes for innovative technologies. Methods A systematic literature review was undertaken to identify published papers and reports that described and/or assessed the use of sandboxes in the healthcare sector. Searches were conducted in Medline, Embase, Econlit, Social Policy and Practice, and Health Management Information Consortium databases from inception to March 2020. Free-text Google search was also conducted to identify relevant grey literature. Only papers and reports discussing or evaluating the use of sandboxes in healthcare settings and published in English were included. Included studies were qualitatively summarised using a thematic analysis approach. Results Overall, 46 papers and reports were included. The topics covered were classified into 4 major themes: history of the regulatory sandbox, the sandbox as a testing environment, the sandbox as a regulatory approach, examples of using sandboxes in healthcare. Findings show that the use of regulatory sandboxes in healthcare is relatively new and primarily used in high-income countries to support the adoption of new technologies, particularly those related to digital health. Recommendations are made based on these findings to guide its use in HTA policy and methods development. Conclusions Sandboxes are increasingly used within healthcare regulation. Despite its potential, this approach has not been used in HTA policy and methodological developments to date. HTA agencies should consider this approach to facilitate developing policies, methods and processes for innovative and disruptive health technologies. Transferability to low- and middle-income countries’ settings, however, should be assessed.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily Leckenby & Dalia Dawoud & Jacoline Bouvy & Páll Jónsson, 2021. "The Sandbox Approach and its Potential for Use in Health Technology Assessment: A Literature Review," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 857-869, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:19:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1007_s40258-021-00665-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-021-00665-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-021-00665-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-021-00665-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmad Alaassar & Anne-Laure Mention & Tor Helge Aas, 2023. "Facilitating innovation in FinTech: a review and research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 33-66, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:19:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1007_s40258-021-00665-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.