IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v18y2020i5d10.1007_s40258-020-00563-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Potential Benefits of Deferred Payment for a Hypothetical Gene Therapy for Congestive Heart Failure: A Cost-Consequence Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jakub P. Hlávka

    (University of Southern California)

  • Soeren Mattke

    (University of Southern California)

  • Asa Wilks

    (RAND Corporation)

Abstract

Background The emergence of potentially curative pharmacologic treatments that deliver long-term clinical benefits with a limited number of doses may create short-term budget challenges for payers as their unit price can be high. Objective This paper tests the clinical and financial properties of a deferred payment model (DPM) in hypothetical therapy for congestive heart failure (CHF) from the perspective of payers, manufacturers, and patients. Methods We present an empirical analysis of longitudinal data for cardiovascular admissions and mortality using a Markov transition model for patient progression under different payment scenarios. The model calculates life-years gained and avoided cardiovascular admissions under the status quo and deferred payment and a hypothetical budget constraint. We tracked over 91,000 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries over a period of 5 years (2009–2014) using MedPAR 5% data files. Results We find that a DPM is associated with earlier treatment and a consequent improvement in clinical outcomes. A 25% down-payment is associated with the highest relative improvement and reduces hospital admissions by 0.52% (by 2611 vs. 2071 cases) and mortality by 0.29% (by 799 vs. 648 cases), both relative to the status quo payment. Deferred payment results in limited financial gains for payers or manufacturers, primarily because of the small share of expected cost savings on the total cost of therapy. Our results are robust to changes in relative risk for cardiovascular admissions and a change in the cost of therapy. Conclusions A DPM may result in faster access to CHF gene therapy and may thus reduce hospital admissions and mortality in contrast to a status quo payment with the same budget constraint. Although the financial benefits of a DPM in CHF gene therapy are limited, it is possible that deferred payments will show greater promise for treatments with higher cost offsets.

Suggested Citation

  • Jakub P. Hlávka & Soeren Mattke & Asa Wilks, 2020. "The Potential Benefits of Deferred Payment for a Hypothetical Gene Therapy for Congestive Heart Failure: A Cost-Consequence Analysis," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 18(5), pages 669-677, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:18:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s40258-020-00563-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-020-00563-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-020-00563-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-020-00563-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Blog mentions

    As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
    1. Chris Sampson’s journal round-up for 19th October 2020
      by Chris Sampson in The Academic Health Economists' Blog on 2020-10-19 11:00:05

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dubois, Pierre & Magnac, Thierry, 2024. "Optimal intertemporal curative drug expenses: The case of hepatitis C in France," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:18:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s40258-020-00563-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.