Author
Listed:
- Michel L. Peters
(Real World Strategy and Analytics, Mapi Group)
- Claudine Meijer
(Bayer B.V.)
- Dirk Wyndaele
(Catharina Ziekenhuis)
- Walter Noordzij
(University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen)
- Annemarie M. Leliveld-Kors
(University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen)
- Joan Bosch
(Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis)
- Pieter H. Berg
(Tergooi Ziekenhuizen)
- Agni Baka
(Real World Strategy and Analytics, Mapi Group)
- Jennifer G. Gaultney
(Real World Strategy and Analytics, Mapi Group)
Abstract
Background The treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer has changed with the introduction of radium-223, cabazitaxel, abiraterone and enzalutamide. To assess value for money, their cost effectiveness in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel from the Dutch societal perspective was investigated. Methods A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using efficacy, symptomatic skeletal-related event and safety data obtained from indirect treatment comparisons. Missing skeletal-related event data for cabazitaxel were conservatively assumed to be identical to radium-223. A Markov model combined these clinical inputs with Dutch-specific resource use and costs for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treatment from a societal perspective. Total quality-adjusted life-years and costs in 2017 euros were calculated over a 5-year (lifetime) time horizon. Results Radium-223 resulted in €6092 and €4465 lower costs and 0.02 and 0.01 higher quality-adjusted life-years compared with abiraterone and cabazitaxel, respectively, demonstrating dominance of radium-223. Sensitivity analyses reveal a 64% (54%) chance of radium-223 being cost effective compared with abiraterone (cabazitaxel) at the informal €80,000 willingness-to-pay threshold. Compared with enzalutamide, radium-223 resulted in slightly lower quality-adjusted life-years (−0.06) and €7390 lower costs, revealing a 61% chance of radium-223 being cost effective compared with enzalutamide. The lower costs of radium-223 compared with abiraterone and enzalutamide are driven by lower drug costs and prevention of expensive skeletal-related events. Compared with cabazitaxel, the lower costs of radium-223 are driven by lower costs of the drug, administration and adverse events. Conclusion Radium-223 may be a less costly treatment strategy offering similar gains in health benefits compared with abiraterone, cabazitaxel and enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel from the Dutch societal perspective.
Suggested Citation
Michel L. Peters & Claudine Meijer & Dirk Wyndaele & Walter Noordzij & Annemarie M. Leliveld-Kors & Joan Bosch & Pieter H. Berg & Agni Baka & Jennifer G. Gaultney, 2018.
"Dutch Economic Value of Radium-223 in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer,"
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 133-143, February.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:16:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s40258-017-0350-x
DOI: 10.1007/s40258-017-0350-x
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:16:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s40258-017-0350-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.