Author
Abstract
In the Vehicle Routing literature, investigations have concentrated on problems in whichthe customer demands are known precisely. We consider an application in which the demandsare unknown prior to the creation of vehicle routes, but follow some known probabilitydistribution. Because of the variability in customer demands, it is possible that the actualtotal customer demand may exceed the capacity of the vehicle assigned to service thosecustomers. In this case, we have a route failure , and there is an additional cost related to thecustomer at which the vehicle stocks out. We aim to find routes that minimise the sum of thedistance travelled plus any additional expected costs due to route failure. Because of thedifficulty of this problem, this investigation only considers a single‐vehicle problem. Tofind optimal routes, the integer L‐shaped method is used. We solve a relaxed IP in which thedistance travelled is modelled exactly, but the expected costs due to route failure are approximated.Constraints are dynamically added to prevent subtours and to further improve therelaxation. Additional constraints (optimality cuts) are added which progressively form atighter approximation of the costs due to route failure. Gendreau et al. [6] apply a similarmethodology to a closely related problem. They add optimality cuts, each of which imposesa useful bound on the route failure cost for only one solution. In addition to that cut, wegenerate “general” optimality cuts, each of which imposes a useful bound on the route failurecost for many solutions. Computational results attesting to the success of this approach arepresented. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999
Suggested Citation
C. Hjorring & J. Holt, 1999.
"New optimality cuts for a single‐vehicle stochastic routing problem,"
Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 86(0), pages 569-584, January.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:annopr:v:86:y:1999:i:0:p:569-584:10.1023/a:1018995927636
DOI: 10.1023/A:1018995927636
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:86:y:1999:i:0:p:569-584:10.1023/a:1018995927636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.