IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v77y1998i0p229-25210.1023-a1018977428236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An efficient heuristic for robot acquisition and cell formation

Author

Listed:
  • Bernard Han
  • Jack Cook

Abstract

In this paper, a mathematical model and a solution algorithm are developed for solving a robot acquisition and cell formation problem (RACFP). Our model considers purchasing a proper mix of robots and assigning all given workstations to purchased robots such that each robot cell satisfies its workstations' resource demands while minimizing the total system (acquisition) cost. Specifically, each robot has two capacity constraints - available work envelope and effective machine time. RACFP is formulated as a multi-type two-dimensional bin packing problem, a pure 0-1 integer program which is known to be NP-hard. In this paper, a very efficient (polynomial time bound) heuristic algorithm is developed and implemented. The algorithm consists of two major stages. The first stage employs an LP-based bounding procedure to produce a tight solution bound, whereas the second stage repetitively invokes a random search heuristic using a greedy evaluation function. The algorithm is tested by solving 450 randomly generated problems based on realistic parameter values. Computational results show that the heuristic algorithm has outperformed algorithms using general optimization techniques such as Simulated Annealing and Column Generation. All test problems are solved within an order of magnitude of 10 seconds, with a gap of less than 1% from the optimum. More importantly, over 70% of all solutions are optimal (334 out of 450). The algorithm can be easily modified for other applications such as file placement for a multi-device storage system and job scheduling for a multi-processing system. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Suggested Citation

  • Bernard Han & Jack Cook, 1998. "An efficient heuristic for robot acquisition and cell formation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 77(0), pages 229-252, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:77:y:1998:i:0:p:229-252:10.1023/a:1018977428236
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1018977428236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1018977428236
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1018977428236?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yulia Sullivan & Marc Bourmont & Mary Dunaway, 2022. "Appraisals of harms and injustice trigger an eerie feeling that decreases trust in artificial intelligence systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 525-548, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:77:y:1998:i:0:p:229-252:10.1023/a:1018977428236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.