IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v339y2024i3d10.1007_s10479-021-04006-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Handling of uncertainty in medical data using machine learning and probability theory techniques: a review of 30 years (1991–2020)

Author

Listed:
  • Roohallah Alizadehsani

    (Deakin University)

  • Mohamad Roshanzamir

    (Fasa University)

  • Sadiq Hussain

    (Dibrugarh University)

  • Abbas Khosravi

    (Deakin University)

  • Afsaneh Koohestani

    (Deakin University)

  • Mohammad Hossein Zangooei

    (University of Texas At Dallas)

  • Moloud Abdar

    (Deakin University)

  • Adham Beykikhoshk

    (Deakin University)

  • Afshin Shoeibi

    (Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
    K. N. Toosi University of Technology)

  • Assef Zare

    (Islamic Azad University)

  • Maryam Panahiazar

    (University of California)

  • Saeid Nahavandi

    (Deakin University)

  • Dipti Srinivasan

    (National University of Singapore)

  • Amir F. Atiya

    (Cairo University)

  • U. Rajendra Acharya

    (Ngee Ann Polytechnic
    Singapore University of Social Sciences
    Asia University)

Abstract

Understanding the data and reaching accurate conclusions are of paramount importance in the present era of big data. Machine learning and probability theory methods have been widely used for this purpose in various fields. One critically important yet less explored aspect is capturing and analyzing uncertainties in the data and model. Proper quantification of uncertainty helps to provide valuable information to obtain accurate diagnosis. This paper reviewed related studies conducted in the last 30 years (from 1991 to 2020) in handling uncertainties in medical data using probability theory and machine learning techniques. Medical data is more prone to uncertainty due to the presence of noise in the data. So, it is very important to have clean medical data without any noise to get accurate diagnosis. The sources of noise in the medical data need to be known to address this issue. Based on the medical data obtained by the physician, diagnosis of disease, and treatment plan are prescribed. Hence, the uncertainty is growing in healthcare and there is limited knowledge to address these problems. Our findings indicate that there are few challenges to be addressed in handling the uncertainty in medical raw data and new models. In this work, we have summarized various methods employed to overcome this problem. Nowadays, various novel deep learning techniques have been proposed to deal with such uncertainties and improve the performance in decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Roohallah Alizadehsani & Mohamad Roshanzamir & Sadiq Hussain & Abbas Khosravi & Afsaneh Koohestani & Mohammad Hossein Zangooei & Moloud Abdar & Adham Beykikhoshk & Afshin Shoeibi & Assef Zare & Maryam, 2024. "Handling of uncertainty in medical data using machine learning and probability theory techniques: a review of 30 years (1991–2020)," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(3), pages 1077-1118, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:339:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04006-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-021-04006-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-021-04006-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-021-04006-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mirta Galesic & Gerd Gigerenzer & Nils Straubinger, 2009. "Natural Frequencies Help Older Adults and People with Low Numeracy to Evaluate Medical Screening Tests," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 29(3), pages 368-371, May.
    2. Mehrnaz Shoushtarian & Roohallah Alizadehsani & Abbas Khosravi & Nicola Acevedo & Colette M McKay & Saeid Nahavandi & James B Fallon, 2020. "Objective measurement of tinnitus using functional near-infrared spectroscopy and machine learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Alessandro Gasparini & Keith R. Abrams & Jessica K. Barrett & Rupert W. Major & Michael J. Sweeting & Nigel J. Brunskill & Michael J. Crowther, 2020. "Mixed‐effects models for health care longitudinal data with an informative visiting process: A Monte Carlo simulation study," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(1), pages 5-23, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yaniv Hanoch & Jonathan J. Rolison & Alexandra M. Freund, 2018. "Does Medical Risk Perception and Risk Taking Change with Age?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(5), pages 917-928, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:339:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04006-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.