IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v339y2024i1d10.1007_s10479-022-05037-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A data-driven spatially-specific vaccine allocation framework for COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Zhaofu Hong

    (Northwestern Polytechnical University)

  • Yingjie Li

    (Central South University
    Lanzhou University)

  • Yeming Gong

    (EMLYON Business School)

  • Wanying Chen

    (Zhejiang Gongshang University)

Abstract

Although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines have been introduced, their allocation is a challenging problem. We propose a data-driven, spatially-specific vaccine allocation framework that aims to minimize the number of COVID-19-related deaths or infections. The framework combines a regional risk-level classification model solved by a self-organizing map neural network, a spatially-specific disease progression model, and a vaccine allocation model that considers vaccine production capacity. We use data obtained from Wuhan and 35 other cities in China from January 26 to February 11, 2020, to avoid the effects of intervention. Our results suggest that, in region-wise distribution of vaccines, they should be allocated first to the source region of the outbreak and then to the other regions in order of decreasing risk whether the outcome measure is the number of deaths or infections. This spatially-specific vaccine allocation policy significantly outperforms some current allocation policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhaofu Hong & Yingjie Li & Yeming Gong & Wanying Chen, 2024. "A data-driven spatially-specific vaccine allocation framework for COVID-19," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(1), pages 203-226, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:339:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-022-05037-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-022-05037-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-022-05037-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-022-05037-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ozgur Araz & Alison Galvani & Lauren Meyers, 2012. "Geographic prioritization of distributing pandemic influenza vaccines," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 175-187, September.
    2. Min, Hokey & Jeung Ko, Hyun & Seong Ko, Chang, 2006. "A genetic algorithm approach to developing the multi-echelon reverse logistics network for product returns," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 56-69, January.
    3. Nidhi Subbaraman, 2020. "Who gets a COVID vaccine first? Access plans are taking shape," Nature, Nature, vol. 585(7826), pages 492-493, September.
    4. Francesc Aràndiga & Antonio Baeza & Isabel Cordero-Carrión & Rosa Donat & M. Carmen Martí & Pep Mulet & Dionisio F. Yáñez, 2020. "A Spatial-Temporal Model for the Evolution of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain Including Mobility," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-19, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schweiger, Katharina & Sahamie, Ramin, 2013. "A hybrid Tabu Search approach for the design of a paper recycling network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 98-119.
    2. Bhattacharya, Sourabh & Govindan, Kannan & Ghosh Dastidar, Surajit & Sharma, Preeti, 2024. "Applications of artificial intelligence in closed-loop supply chains: Systematic literature review and future research agenda," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. Li, Gang & Jiang, Hongxun & He, Tian, 2015. "A genetic algorithm-based decomposition approach to solve an integrated equipment-workforce-service planning problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1-17.
    4. Sanjay Mehrotra & Hamed Rahimian & Masoud Barah & Fengqiao Luo & Karolina Schantz, 2020. "A model of supply‐chain decisions for resource sharing with an application to ventilator allocation to combat COVID‐19," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(5), pages 303-320, August.
    5. Srivastava, Samir K., 2008. "Network design for reverse logistics," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 535-548, August.
    6. Gilani, Hani & Sahebi, Hadi, 2022. "A data-driven robust optimization model by cutting hyperplanes on vaccine access uncertainty in COVID-19 vaccine supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    7. Georgiadis, Patroklos & Athanasiou, Efstratios, 2010. "The impact of two-product joint lifecycles on capacity planning of remanufacturing networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(2), pages 420-433, April.
    8. Farheen Naz & Rohit Agrawal & Anil Kumar & Angappa Gunasekaran & Abhijit Majumdar & Sunil Luthra, 2022. "Reviewing the applications of artificial intelligence in sustainable supply chains: Exploring research propositions for future directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2400-2423, July.
    9. Zhao, Ze & Wang, Jianzhou & Zhao, Jing & Su, Zhongyue, 2012. "Using a Grey model optimized by Differential Evolution algorithm to forecast the per capita annual net income of rural households in China," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 525-532.
    10. Qin, Zhongfeng & Ji, Xiaoyu, 2010. "Logistics network design for product recovery in fuzzy environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(2), pages 479-490, April.
    11. Yıldız, Gazi Bilal & Soylu, Banu, 2019. "A multiobjective post-sales guarantee and repair services network design problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 305-320.
    12. Vidovic, Milorad & Dimitrijevic, Branka & Ratkovic, Branislava & Simic, Vladimir, 2011. "A novel covering approach to positioning ELV collection points," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1-9.
    13. Gamberini, Rita & Gebennini, Elisa & Manzini, Riccardo & Ziveri, Andrea, 2010. "On the integration of planning and environmental impact assessment for a WEEE transportation network—A case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(11), pages 937-951.
    14. Shahparvari, Shahrooz & Hassanizadeh, Behnam & Mohammadi, Alireza & Kiani, Behzad & Lau, Kwok Hung & Chhetri, Prem & Abbasi, Babak, 2022. "A decision support system for prioritised COVID-19 two-dosage vaccination allocation and distribution," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    15. Gołębiewski, Bronisław & Trajer, Jędrzej & Jaros, Małgorzata & Winiczenko, Radosław, 2013. "Modelling of the location of vehicle recycling facilities: A case study in Poland," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 10-20.
    16. Saeid Rezaei & Amirsaman Kheirkhah, 2018. "A comprehensive approach in designing a sustainable closed-loop supply chain network using cross-docking operations," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 51-98, March.
    17. Mahmoudzadeh, Mahdi & Mansour, Saeed & Karimi, Behrouz, 2013. "To develop a third-party reverse logistics network for end-of-life vehicles in Iran," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1-14.
    18. Fadaki, Masih & Abareshi, Ahmad & Far, Shaghayegh Maleki & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo, 2022. "Multi-period vaccine allocation model in a pandemic: A case study of COVID-19 in Australia," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    19. Aksen, Deniz & Aras, Necati & Karaarslan, Ayse Gönül, 2009. "Design and analysis of government subsidized collection systems for incentive-dependent returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 308-327, June.
    20. Barker, Theresa J. & Zabinsky, Zelda B., 2011. "A multicriteria decision making model for reverse logistics using analytical hierarchy process," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 558-573, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:339:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-022-05037-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.