Author
Abstract
This paper introduces the d-distance b-matching problem, in which we are given a bipartite graph $$G=(S,T;E)$$ G = ( S , T ; E ) with $$S=\{s_1,\dots ,s_n\}$$ S = { s 1 , ⋯ , s n } , a weight function on the edges, an integer $$d\in \mathbb {Z}_+$$ d ∈ Z + and a degree bound function $$b:S\cup T\rightarrow \mathbb {Z}_+$$ b : S ∪ T → Z + . The goal is to find a maximum-weight subset $$M\subseteq E$$ M ⊆ E of the edges satisfying the following two conditions: (1) the degree of each node $$v\in S\cup T$$ v ∈ S ∪ T is at most b(v) in M, (2) if $$s_it,s_jt\in M$$ s i t , s j t ∈ M , then $$|i-j|\ge d$$ | i - j | ≥ d . In the cyclic version of the problem, the nodes in S are considered to be in cyclic order. We get back the (cyclic) d-distance matching problem when $$b(s) = 1$$ b ( s ) = 1 for $$s\in S$$ s ∈ S and $$b(t) = \infty $$ b ( t ) = ∞ for $$t\in T$$ t ∈ T . We prove that the d-distance matching problem is APX-hard, even in the unweighted case. We show that $$2-\frac{1}{d}$$ 2 - 1 d is a tight upper bound on the integrality gap of the natural integer programming model for the cyclic d-distance b-matching problem provided that $$(2d-1)$$ ( 2 d - 1 ) divides the size of S. For the non-cyclic case, the integrality gap is shown to be at most $$(2-\frac{2}{d})$$ ( 2 - 2 d ) . The proofs give approximation algorithms with guarantees matching these bounds, and also improve the best known algorithms for the (cyclic) d-distance matching problem. In a related problem, our goal is to find a permutation of S maximizing the weight of the optimal d-distance b-matching. This problem can be solved in polynomial time for the (cyclic) d-distance matching problem — even though the (cyclic) d-distance matching problem itself is NP-hard and also hard to approximate arbitrarily. For (cyclic) d-distance b-matchings, however, we prove that finding the best permutation is NP-hard, even if $$b\equiv 2$$ b ≡ 2 or $$d=2$$ d = 2 , and we give e-approximation algorithms.
Suggested Citation
Péter Madarasi, 2024.
"Matchings under distance constraints II,"
Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 332(1), pages 303-327, January.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:annopr:v:332:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05703-w
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-023-05703-w
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:332:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05703-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.