IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v321y2023i1d10.1007_s10479-022-04976-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitive location problems: balanced facility location and the One-Round Manhattan Voronoi Game

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Byrne

    (University of Strathclyde)

  • Sándor P. Fekete

    (TU Braunschweig)

  • Jörg Kalcsics

    (University of Edinburgh)

  • Linda Kleist

    (TU Braunschweig)

Abstract

We study competitive location problems in a continuous setting, in which facilities have to be placed in a rectangular domain R of normalized dimensions of 1 and $$\rho \ge 1$$ ρ ≥ 1 , and distances are measured according to the Manhattan metric. We show that the family of balanced facility configurations (in which the Voronoi cells of individual facilities are equalized with respect to a number of geometric properties) is considerably richer in this metric than for Euclidean distances. Our main result considers the One-Round Voronoi Game with Manhattan distances, in which first player White and then player Black each place n points in R; each player scores the area for which one of its facilities is closer than the facilities of the opponent. We give a tight characterization: White has a winning strategy if and only if $$\rho \ge n$$ ρ ≥ n ; for all other cases, we present a winning strategy for Black.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Byrne & Sándor P. Fekete & Jörg Kalcsics & Linda Kleist, 2023. "Competitive location problems: balanced facility location and the One-Round Manhattan Voronoi Game," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 321(1), pages 79-101, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:321:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-022-04976-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-022-04976-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-022-04976-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-022-04976-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hakimi, S. Louis, 1983. "On locating new facilities in a competitive environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 29-35, January.
    2. Atsuyuki Okabe & Masaki Aoyagi, 1991. "Existence of equilibrium configurations of competitive firms on an infinite two-dimensional space," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 349-370, May.
    3. Alan S. Manne, 1964. "Plant Location Under Economies-of-Scale--Decentralization and Computation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 213-235, November.
    4. Antoon Kolen, 1981. "Technical Note—Equivalence between the Direct Search Approach and the Cut Approach to the Rectilinear Distance Location Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 616-620, June.
    5. Infante-Macias, R. & Munoz-Perez, J., 1995. "Competitive location with rectilinear distances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 77-85, January.
    6. Sándor P. Fekete & Joseph S. B. Mitchell & Karin Beurer, 2005. "On the Continuous Fermat-Weber Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 61-76, February.
    7. Igor Averbakh & Oded Berman & Jörg Kalcsics & Dmitry Krass, 2015. "Structural Properties of Voronoi Diagrams in Facility Location Problems with Continuous Demand," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(2), pages 394-411, April.
    8. Tammy Drezner, 2019. "Gravity Models in Competitive Facility Location," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: H. A. Eiselt & Vladimir Marianov (ed.), Contributions to Location Analysis, chapter 0, pages 253-275, Springer.
    9. N. Emrah Aydinonat & Emin Köksal, 2019. "Explanatory value in context: the curious case of Hotelling’s location model," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(5), pages 879-910, September.
    10. Drezner, Zvi, 1982. "Competitive location strategies for two facilities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 485-493, November.
    11. Baron, Opher & Berman, Oded & Krass, Dmitry & Wang, Qian, 2007. "The equitable location problem on the plane," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 578-590, December.
    12. G. O. Wesolowsky & R. F. Love, 1971. "Location of facilities with rectangular distances among point and area destinations," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 83-90, March.
    13. Abdullah Dasci, 2011. "Conditional Location Problems on Networks and in the Plane," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: H. A. Eiselt & Vladimir Marianov (ed.), Foundations of Location Analysis, chapter 0, pages 179-206, Springer.
    14. Aoyagi, Masaki & Okabe, Atsuyuki, 1993. "Spatial competition of firms in a two-dimensional bounded market," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 259-289, April.
    15. Suzuki, Atsuo & Drezner, Zvi, 2009. "The minimum equitable radius location problem with continuous demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(1), pages 17-30, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Drezner, Zvi & Eiselt, H.A., 2024. "Competitive location models: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(1), pages 5-18.
    2. Byrne, Thomas & Kalcsics, Jörg, 2022. "Conditional facility location problems with continuous demand and a polygonal barrier," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(1), pages 22-43.
    3. Mahmutogullari, Ali Irfan & Kara, Bahar Y., 2016. "Hub location under competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(1), pages 214-225.
    4. Tammy Drezner & Zvi Drezner & Atsuo Suzuki, 2019. "A cover based competitive facility location model with continuous demand," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(7), pages 565-581, October.
    5. Tammy Drezner & Zvi Drezner & Dawit Zerom, 2020. "Facility Dependent Distance Decay in Competitive Location," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 915-934, December.
    6. Abdullah Dasci & Gilbert Laporte, 2005. "A Continuous Model for Multistore Competitive Location," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 263-280, April.
    7. Kalczynski, Pawel & Drezner, Zvi, 2022. "The Obnoxious Facilities Planar p-Median Problem with Variable Sizes," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    8. Vladimir Marianov & H. A. Eiselt, 2016. "On agglomeration in competitive location models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 246(1), pages 31-55, November.
    9. Tammy Drezner & Morton O’Kelly & Zvi Drezner, 2023. "Multipurpose shopping trips and location," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 321(1), pages 191-208, February.
    10. Igor Averbakh & Oded Berman & Jörg Kalcsics & Dmitry Krass, 2015. "Structural Properties of Voronoi Diagrams in Facility Location Problems with Continuous Demand," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(2), pages 394-411, April.
    11. Drezner, Tammy & Drezner, Zvi & Salhi, Said, 2002. "Solving the multiple competitive facilities location problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 138-151, October.
    12. Huck, Steffen & Knoblauch, Vicki & Muller, Wieland, 2003. "On the profitability of collusion in location games," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 499-510, November.
    13. Rongbing Huang, 2016. "A short note on locating facilities on a path to minimize load range equity measure," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 246(1), pages 363-369, November.
    14. Zvi Drezner & Mozart B. C. Menezes, 2016. "The wisdom of voters: evaluating the Weber objective in the plane at the Condorcet solution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 246(1), pages 205-226, November.
    15. Drezner, Tammy & Drezner, Zvi & Hulliger, Beat, 2014. "The Quintile Share Ratio in location analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 166-174.
    16. Tammy Drezner & Zvi Drezner & Pawel Kalczynski, 2020. "Gradual cover competitive facility location," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 42(2), pages 333-354, June.
    17. Eiselt, H.A. & Marianov, Vladimir, 2020. "Maximizing political vote in multiple districts," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    18. Granot, Daniel & Granot, Frieda & Raviv, Tal, 2010. "On competitive sequential location in a network with a decreasing demand intensity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 301-312, September.
    19. Vladimir Marianov & H. A. Eiselt & Armin Lüer-Villagra, 2020. "The Follower Competitive Location Problem with Comparison-Shopping," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 367-393, June.
    20. Uno, Takeshi & Katagiri, Hideki, 2008. "Single- and multi-objective defensive location problems on a network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(1), pages 76-84, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:321:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-022-04976-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.