IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v265y2018i2d10.1007_s10479-016-2390-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental comparisons with respect to the usage of the promising relations in EDA-based causal discovery

Author

Listed:
  • Song Ko

    (Chung-Ang University)

  • Hyunki Lim

    (Chung-Ang University)

  • Hoon Ko

    (Sungkyunkwan University)

  • Dae-Won Kim

    (Chung-Ang University)

Abstract

A Bayesian network is a promising probabilistic model to represent causal relations between nodes (random variables). One of the major research issue in a Bayesian network is how to infer causal relations from a dataset by constructing better heuristic learning algorithms. Many kinds of approaches were so far introduced, and estimation of distribution algorithms (EDAs) are one of the promising causal discovery algorithms. However, the performance of EDAs is considerably dependent on the quality of the first population because new individuals are reproduced from the previous populations. In this paper, we introduce a new initialization method for EDAs that extracts promising candidate causal relations based on causal scores. Then, we used the promising relations to construct a better first population and to reproduce better individuals until the learning algorithm is terminated. Experimental results show that EDAs infer a more number of correct causal relations when promising relations were used in EDA based structure learning. It means that the performance of EDAs can be improved by providing better local search space, and it was the promising relations in this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Song Ko & Hyunki Lim & Hoon Ko & Dae-Won Kim, 2018. "Experimental comparisons with respect to the usage of the promising relations in EDA-based causal discovery," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 265(2), pages 241-255, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:265:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-016-2390-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-016-2390-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-016-2390-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-016-2390-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:265:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-016-2390-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.