IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v131y2004i1p79-9910.1023-banor.0000039513.99038.c6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pareto Ant Colony Optimization: A Metaheuristic Approach to Multiobjective Portfolio Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Karl Doerner
  • Walter Gutjahr
  • Richard Hartl
  • Christine Strauss
  • Christian Stummer

Abstract

Selecting the “best” project portfolio out of a given set of investment proposals is a common and often critical management issue. Decision-makers must regularly consider multiple objectives and often have little a priori preference information available to them. Given these contraints, they can improve their chances of achieving success by following a two-phase procedure that first determines the solution space of all efficient (i.e., Pareto-optimal) portfolios and then allows them to interactively explore that space. However, the task of determining the solution space is not trivial: brute-force complete enumeration only works for small instances and the underlying NP-hard problem becomes increasingly demanding as the number of projects grows. Meta-heuristics provide a useful compromise between the amount of computation time necessary and the quality of the approximated solution space. This paper introduces Pareto Ant Colony Optimization as an especially effective meta-heuristic for solving the portfolio selection problem and compares its performance to other heuristic approaches (i.e., Pareto Simulated Annealing and the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm) by means of computational experiments with random instances. Furthermore, we provide a numerical example based on real world data. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Suggested Citation

  • Karl Doerner & Walter Gutjahr & Richard Hartl & Christine Strauss & Christian Stummer, 2004. "Pareto Ant Colony Optimization: A Metaheuristic Approach to Multiobjective Portfolio Selection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 79-99, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:131:y:2004:i:1:p:79-99:10.1023/b:anor.0000039513.99038.c6
    DOI: 10.1023/B:ANOR.0000039513.99038.c6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/B:ANOR.0000039513.99038.c6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/B:ANOR.0000039513.99038.c6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:131:y:2004:i:1:p:79-99:10.1023/b:anor.0000039513.99038.c6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.