IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v113y2002i1p101-11710.1023-a1020905810996.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Queues with Equally Heavy Sojourn Time and Service Requirement Distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Rudesindo Núñez-Queija

Abstract

For the G/G/1 queue with First-Come First-Served, it is well known that the tail of the sojourn time distribution is heavier than the tail of the service requirement distribution when the latter has a regularly varying tail. In contrast, for the M/G/1 queue with Processor Sharing, Zwart and Boxma [26] showed that under the same assumptions on the service requirement distribution, the two tails are “equally heavy”. By means of a probabilistic analysis we provide a new insightful proof of this result, allowing for the slightly weaker assumption of service requirement distributions with a tail of intermediate regular variation. The new approach allows us to also establish the “tail equivalence” for two other service disciplines: Foreground–Background Processor Sharing and Shortest Remaining Processing Time. The method can also be applied to more complicated models, for which no explicit formulas exist for (transforms of) the sojourn time distribution. One such model is the M/G/1 Processor Sharing queue with service that is subject to random interruptions. The latter model is of particular interest for the performance analysis of communication networks. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Suggested Citation

  • Rudesindo Núñez-Queija, 2002. "Queues with Equally Heavy Sojourn Time and Service Requirement Distributions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 113(1), pages 101-117, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:113:y:2002:i:1:p:101-117:10.1023/a:1020905810996
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1020905810996
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1020905810996
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1020905810996?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:113:y:2002:i:1:p:101-117:10.1023/a:1020905810996. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.