IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spi/joabfr/v9y2020i2p73-81id311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fiscal Policy and Stock Market Efficiency in the USA: An ARDL Bounds Testing Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Anthony Adams

Abstract

The basic aim of this study is to evaluate the market efficiency hypothesis by using the fiscal policy information implemented in the context of the New York Stock Exchange. In order to take into account that the macroeconomic data of a developed country like USA has a limited size and may be governed by structural breaks and inconsistencies this paper proposed the adoption of the ARDL bounds testing approaching in order to effectively evaluate the relationship between the lagged macroeconomic variables and the stock market returns. Also, the use of this technique allows for the evaluation of both short run and long run relationships and associations among the variables. The study uses data from 2008-2018 to investigate the efficiency of the stock market. The results suggest that in the long run the stock prices fully reflect the information issued by the fiscal policy and reflect on the past activities of the fiscal policy as well. In the short run however, the New York stock exchange index S&P 500 reacts differently. The NYSE stock index was found to only efficiently reflect the unexpected news from the fiscal policy. Moreover, the results also show that the prices in terms of oil, production and consumer prices were also found to be correlated with the stock prices. The increase in the consumer prices or inflation and average economic translates in increased profitability for the firms and the increase in the oil prices seems to have a negative impact on the firm profitability

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Anthony Adams, 2020. "Fiscal Policy and Stock Market Efficiency in the USA: An ARDL Bounds Testing Approach," Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, Scientific Publishing Institute, vol. 9(2), pages 73-81.
  • Handle: RePEc:spi:joabfr:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:73-81:id:311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://scipg.com/index.php/102/article/view/311/383
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spi:joabfr:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:73-81:id:311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marina Taylor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://scipg.com/index.php/102/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.