IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spi/ijetss/v17y2024i2p46-51id848.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public confidence towards judiciary court: An empirical study in Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Md Sha Jalal
  • Md Akramul Hasan
  • Mahmuda Akter

Abstract

The judiciary is the most significant component of the criminal justice system, which ensures the legal rights of citizens and is strongly linked to public confidence. The judiciary system of Bangladesh is ineffective and inadequate in safeguarding citizens' rights, highlighting the need for the building of trust between citizens and the judiciary system. The main objective of this study was to explore the nature of public trust in the judiciary system in Bangladesh. Moreover, it also identified the entire public perception of the judicial system, which influences public trust in the judiciary. The study was quantitative in nature which followed the survey method, and the data was collected from 52 respondents. This study found that around 63.5% of the participants expressed a negative perception regarding the court's integrity and meticulousness in dealing with people. At the same time, specifically 38.5% who agreed and 48.1% who strongly agreed, believe that corruption has a substantial impact on the level of public confidence in the judiciary court system. Additionally, 51.9% of the respondents believed that unfriendly behavior has an impact on the level of public confidence in the judiciary court system. Most importantly, the majority of respondents (76.9%) assess the courts' performance in ensuring responsibility as either low (53.8%) or average (23.1%). Finally, this study suggests that the government and concerned authorities should take proactive measures to enhance public confidence in the justice system.

Suggested Citation

  • Md Sha Jalal & Md Akramul Hasan & Mahmuda Akter, 2024. "Public confidence towards judiciary court: An empirical study in Bangladesh," International Journal of Emerging Trends in Social Sciences, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 17(2), pages 46-51.
  • Handle: RePEc:spi:ijetss:v:17:y:2024:i:2:p:46-51:id:848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://scipg.com/index.php/103/article/view/848/667
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spi:ijetss:v:17:y:2024:i:2:p:46-51:id:848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marina Taylor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://scipg.com/index.php/103/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.