IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sph/rjedep/v2y2013i4p61-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of weight indicators of TOPSIS technique in the selected district in the Slovak Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Roman Vavrek

    (University of Presov, Slovakia)

  • Peter Adamisin

    (University of Presov, Slovakia)

Abstract

The purpose of multicriteria decision models is to help decision maker to evaluate each alternative and to rank them in descending order of performance. This study analyses the concept of Multiple Attribute Decision Making for using in local government area. The aim of this paper is to analyse the concept of Multiple Attribute Decision Making for selecting the most efficient municipality in selected district in the Slovak Republic. Achieving this purpose, TOPSIS technique (in two variants) is used as decision making tools.

Suggested Citation

  • Roman Vavrek & Peter Adamisin, 2013. "Impact of weight indicators of TOPSIS technique in the selected district in the Slovak Republic," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 2(4), pages 61-73, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sph:rjedep:v:2:y:2013:i:4:p:61-73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jedep.spiruharet.ro/RePEc/sph/rjedep/Rev7_6_Vavrek.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roman Vavrek, 2018. "Efficiency and inefficiency of public administration," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 7(1), pages 6-14, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    TOPSIS technique; municipality; Presov district;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H79 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sph:rjedep:v:2:y:2013:i:4:p:61-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Tonis (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jedep.spiruharet.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.