IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sja/journl/v5y2016i1p101-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Termination Of The Caretaking Contract For Enforcement Objective Impossibility. Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Ileana Constantinescu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Adriana Motatu

    (Law Department, Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

Abstract

This study refers to a frequently used contract, namely the contract of caretaking, and presents the cancellation of this contract for the objective impossibility of out carrying it. Also, this case study highlights the legal issues that may occur in the situation of objective impossibility of execution of the caretaking obliga tion by the debtor – caretaker. In case of cancellation of such a contract there can be no discussion of succesors in rights from the debtor – caretaker because there is no mention about the continuity of the contract with the successors. Only from the creditor that was taken care of, there has been a will in favour of another person from outside the family, namely a third party

Suggested Citation

  • Ileana Constantinescu & Adriana Motatu, 2016. "Termination Of The Caretaking Contract For Enforcement Objective Impossibility. Case Study," Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), vol. 5(1), pages 101-103, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:5:y:2016:i:1:p:101-103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://businesslawconference.ro/revista/articole/an5nr1/Art.%2015%20Motatu,%20Constantinescu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    contract of caretaking; case study; succesors in rights; caretaking obligation; debtor caretaker; creditor; third party.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K11 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Property Law
    • K12 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Contract Law
    • K36 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Family and Personal Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:5:y:2016:i:1:p:101-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssjarea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.