IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgm/resrep/v2i29y2018p7-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wejscia na rynek nowych firm a konkurencyjnosc przedsiebiorstw istniejacych (The entrance of new companies into a??market versus the competitiveness of existing market players)

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandra Gawel

    (Katedra Konkurencyjnosci Miedzynarodowej, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu)

Abstract

Theoretical models do not give a??satisfying and conclusive answer to the question how the growing pressure on the market resulting from increased entrepreneurial activities will affect the competitiveness of established companies. Both positive and negative arguments can be presented in regards to the effect of new entrants on existing market players. One opinion is that the success or failure of companies already on the market is what attracts new entrants. The aim of the paper is to verify the relationship between the entrance of new companies into a market and the competitiveness of existing market players. In an attempt to settle the matter, econometric research was conducted on the competitiveness of existing companies in the various Polish regions, and also on the rate at which new companies were established. The time period for the research was 2005–2016. The results of the research indicate a lack of relationship between the entrance of new companies into a??market and the competitiveness of existing ones. The parameters of regression functions were statistically insignificant. Which in turn indicates that new company creation, and the development of a competitive position by existing companies happen separately from each other. The belief that entrepreneurship is crucial to economic growth has led to increased interest in aspects of domestic policy which would encourage the creation of new businesses. Research results let to suppose that policy supporting process of new company creation should not negatively influence the existing market players by raising the competitive pressure.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandra Gawel, 2018. "Wejscia na rynek nowych firm a konkurencyjnosc przedsiebiorstw istniejacych (The entrance of new companies into a??market versus the competitiveness of existing market players)," Research Reports, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 2(29), pages 7-17.
    • Handle: RePEc:sgm:resrep:v:2:i:29:y:2018:p:7-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sim.wz.uw.edu.pl/sites/default/files/artykuly/sim_2018_2_2_a_gawel.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ivan Turok, 2004. "Cities, Regions and Competitiveness," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(9), pages 1069-1083.
    2. Pei-Chou Lin & Deng-Shing Huang, 2008. "Technological Regimes and Firm Survival: Evidence Across Sectors and Over Time," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 175-186, February.
    3. Michael Peneder, 2008. "Firm entry and turnover: the nexus with profitability and growth," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 327-344, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleksandra Gawel, 2014. "Entrepreneurship in Relation to the Competitive Potential and Position of Economies," Theory Methodology Practice (TMP), Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 10(01), pages 9-20.
    2. Francesco Bogliacino & Mario Pianta, 2016. "The Pavitt Taxonomy, revisited: patterns of innovation in manufacturing and services," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 33(2), pages 153-180, August.
    3. Jaime Sobrino, 2012. "Competitiveness, sustainability and urban energy use: some lessons for Europe from the Mexican experience," Chapters, in: Peter Karl Kresl & Daniele Ietri (ed.), European Cities and Global Competitiveness, chapter 12, pages 219-242, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Víctor G. Alfaro-García & Anna M. Gil-Lafuente & Gerardo G. Alfaro Calderón, 2017. "A fuzzy approach to a municipality grouping model towards creation of synergies," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 391-408, September.
    5. Jenny Muir, 2014. "Neoliberalising a divided society? The regeneration of Crumlin Road Gaol and Girdwood Park, North Belfast," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 29(1-2), pages 52-64, February.
    6. Jana Kourilova & Rene Wokoun & Milan Damborsky & Nikola Krejcova, 2012. "The competitiveness of EU regions," ERSA conference papers ersa12p788, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Dula Borozan, 2008. "Regional Competitiveness: Some Conceptual Issues and Policy Implications," Interdisciplinary Management Research, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 4, pages 50-63, May.
    8. Fantechi, Federico & Fratesi, Ugo, 2024. "Spatial patterns of territorial competitiveness: The role of peripherality, urbanization and physical geography," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    9. Luca Salvati & Marco Zitti, 2017. "Urban Concentration, Agglomeration Economies and the Spatial Structure of Italian Local Labor Market Areas," Research in Applied Economics, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Peter Mayerhofer & Oliver Fritz & Dieter Pennerstorfer, 2010. "Dritter Bericht zur internationalen Wettbewerbsfähigkeit Wiens," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 42430.
    11. James Rees & Alex Lord, 2013. "Making space: Putting politics back where it belongs in the construction of city regions in the North of England," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 28(7-8), pages 679-695, November.
    12. Zhang M. & Mohnen P., 2013. "Innovation and survival of new firms in Chinese manufacturing, 2000-2006," MERIT Working Papers 2013-057, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    13. Argentino Pessoa, 2013. "Competitiveness, Clusters And Policy At The Regional Level: Rhetoric Vs. Practice In Designing Policy For Depressed Regions," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(1), pages 101-116, June.
    14. Ayda Eraydın & Bilge Armatlı Köroğlu & Hilal Erkuş Öztürk & Suna Senem Yaşar, 2008. "Network Governance for Competitiveness: The Role of Policy Networks in the Economic Performance of Settlements in the Izmir Region," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(11), pages 2291-2321, October.
    15. Helene Martin‐Brelot & Michel Grossetti & Denis Eckert & Olga Gritsai & Zoltán Kovács, 2010. "The Spatial Mobility of the ‘Creative Class’: A European Perspective," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 854-870, December.
    16. Nicola Del Sarto & Alberto Di Minin & Giulio Ferrigno & Andrea Piccaluga, 2021. "Born global and well educated: start-up survival through fuzzy set analysis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1405-1423, April.
    17. Maude Toussaint-Comeau & Robin Newberger & Darline Augustine, 2016. "Inclusive Cluster-Based Development Strategies for Inner Cities," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 30(2), pages 171-184, May.
    18. Grégoire Cauchie & Nicolas Gérard Vaillant, 2016. "New Firm Survival: Isolating the Role of Founders’ Human Capital in Accounting for Firm Longevity," Journal of Human Capital, University of Chicago Press, vol. 10(2), pages 186-211.
    19. Jaime Sobrino, 2010. "Economic Structure and Business Organization in the Central Region of Mexico," Chapters, in: Peter Karl Kresl (ed.), Economic Strategies for Mature Industrial Economies, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Peter Mayerhofer & Peter Huber, 2019. "Notwendigkeit und Möglichkeiten kooperativer Raum- und Wirtschaftsentwicklung in der Metropolregion Wien. Problemfelder, Handlungsoptionen, Umsetzungsmöglichkeiten," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 69764.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    entrepreneurial process; competitiveness of companies; threat of new entrance; Polish regions;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgm:resrep:v:2:i:29:y:2018:p:7-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/somuwpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.