IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgm/pzwzuw/v16i80y2018p9-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Coaching Maps as a Tool for Developing Reflectivity in Organisations (Coaching Maps narzedziem ksztaltowania refleksyjnosci w organizacjach)

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Geisler
  • Robert Geisler

    (Institute of Sociology, University of Opole)

Abstract

Our view of organizations, labour and the competencies of managers will soon need to change. In the postmodern and post-Fordist world, economy and organizations function differently than they did in the 20th century. Workers and managers will have to face new expectations. Not only has reflectivity become one of the key organisational factors; it is also taught, learnt and shaped. Drawing on an authoethnographic model and action-research, authors of this paper provide an education and development tool that managers and workers can use to develop and trigger reflectivity. Picture ethnography, coaching philosophy and hermeneutics are theoretical bases for the construction of a new model of self-development.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Geisler & Robert Geisler, 2018. "The Coaching Maps as a Tool for Developing Reflectivity in Organisations (Coaching Maps narzedziem ksztaltowania refleksyjnosci w organizacjach)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 16(80), pages 9-22.
    • Handle: RePEc:sgm:pzwzuw:v:16:i:80:y:2018:p:9-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://press.wz.uw.edu.pl/ems/vol16/iss80/1
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    reflectivity; organizational ethnography; visual ethnography; business anthropology; The Coaching Maps;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z10 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgm:pzwzuw:v:16:i:80:y:2018:p:9-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/somuwpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.