IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgm/pzwzuw/v16i80y2018p23-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation as Reflective Practice (Ewaluacja jako refleksyjna praktyka)

Author

Listed:
  • Paulina Kubera

    (Poznan University of Technology, Faculty of Management Engineering)

Abstract

Reflective practice has become an influential concept in the evaluation field. A greater use of reflective practice is advocated in reference to both evaluators’ own professional development, and as a means to enhance dialogue, stakeholders’ involvement and organisational learning in the evaluation process. The aim of the paper is to examine the evaluation endeavour from the latter perspective, i.e. to present evaluation approaches which offer the opportunity for collaborative reflective practice. To this end, evaluation as reflective practice is discussed at three levels: (1) the organisational level – the model of single, double and triple-loop learning is discussed in reference to formative, summative and developmental evaluation, (2) the evaluator’s level – different roles performed by the evaluator are considered from the point of view of promoting collaborative reflective practice, and (3) the broader socio-political level, in relation to the concept of civil society, as evaluation can contribute not only to a greater rigour and effectiveness of public spending but to social empowerment, to appreciating diversity or building trust (improving democratic policy-making).

Suggested Citation

  • Paulina Kubera, 2018. "Evaluation as Reflective Practice (Ewaluacja jako refleksyjna praktyka)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 16(80), pages 23-38.
  • Handle: RePEc:sgm:pzwzuw:v:16:i:80:y:2018:p:23-38
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://press.wz.uw.edu.pl/ems/vol16/iss80/2
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgm:pzwzuw:v:16:i:80:y:2018:p:23-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/somuwpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.