IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgm/pzwzuw/v16i74y2018p62-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are the Highest Mutual Fund Fees Justified by Their Performance? (Czy wyniki tlumacza wysokosc op³at w najdrozszych funduszach inwestycyjnych?)

Author

Listed:
  • Alicja Fras

    (Poznan University of Economics)

Abstract

A mutual fund fee – being the price of a product – is related to the features of the product, like fund results, which are the base in the inves’s purchase decision making process. In the present study, we examine whether there is a relation between good performance of the fund in the past (1- and 5-year-time horizons) and the current fee. The research for the Polish open-ended mutual funds market in 2017 indicates that there is no clear linear or non-linear relation between past performance and current charges. The computations were conducted using fitting curves packages in the R programming language and a correlation analysis. In the second part of the article, the strategies of investing in the cheapest and the most expensive funds were compared, with a split into fund types (stock, mixed and bond funds). The overall conclusion is that performance is not a driver for imposing higher fees on the investors. If it is not, then either fee distribution among the funds is random or other non-fundamental factors matters. Keywords: mutual fund, fund fees, charges, fund performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Alicja Fras, 2018. "Are the Highest Mutual Fund Fees Justified by Their Performance? (Czy wyniki tlumacza wysokosc op³at w najdrozszych funduszach inwestycyjnych?)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 16(74), pages 62-73.
  • Handle: RePEc:sgm:pzwzuw:v:16:i:74:y:2018:p:62-73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://press.wz.uw.edu.pl/ems/vol16/iss74/3
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    mutual fund; fund fees; charges; fund performance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D53 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Financial Markets
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • C58 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Financial Econometrics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgm:pzwzuw:v:16:i:74:y:2018:p:62-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/somuwpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.