IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgm/pzwzuw/v13i52y2015p78-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Criteria of Ontology Editors Evaluation (Kryteria oceny edytorów ontologii)

Author

Listed:
  • Helena Dudycz

    (Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wroclawiu, Katedra Technologii Informacyjnych)

Abstract

An increasing interest in using ontology, which is to illustrate a model of a specific field, in information systems may be noticed. In order to do that, editors that allow for creating an ontology are used. There is an increasing amount of both open source and commercial software to support the process of creating an ontology. In this article we discussed the suggestion of eleven criteria to evaluate ontology editors. For each of them, we presented a marking scale. The proposed list of criteria may be used to conduct research and evaluation of ontology editors with the use of scoring methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Helena Dudycz, 2015. "Criteria of Ontology Editors Evaluation (Kryteria oceny edytorów ontologii)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 13(52), pages 78-87.
    • Handle: RePEc:sgm:pzwzuw:v:13:i:52:y:2015:p:78-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pz.wz.uw.edu.pl/sites/default/files/artykuly/pz_2015_2-1_dudycz.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://pz.wz.uw.edu.pl/en
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ontology modeling; ontology integration; Methontology; description logic;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgm:pzwzuw:v:13:i:52:y:2015:p:78-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/somuwpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.