IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgm/emswzu/v22i105y2024p22-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation Drive Firm Performance in Hostile Environments? Lessons From the Pandemic Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Marcin Suder

    (Faculty of Management, AGH University of Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the roles of dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation (EO) – risk- -taking, proactiveness, and innovativeness – within the context of a crisis. Specifically, it evaluates the perspectives of entrepreneurs and managers regarding the impact of these dimensions on firm perfor- mance in the hostile environment created by the COVID-19 pandemic. The study adopts a unique per- spective, focusing on retrospective assessments by entrepreneurs and managers rather than traditional econometric measurement techniques. Design/methodology/approach: A quantitative study was conducted, collecting data from 145 owners, managers, and supervisors of small companies in the printing industry in Poland. Respondents assessed the impact of the three EO dimensions on firm performance during the crisis, with each dimension evaluated across multiple aspects and indicators. Unlike traditional approaches, this method relied on subjective, retrospective experiences and evaluations of entrepreneurs and managers, rather than predefined constructs or statistical models. Findings: The results indicate that, in the hostile environment of the pandemic, two of the three EO dimensions, that is, proactiveness and innovativeness, were perceived by entrepreneurs and managers as significant factors mitigating the crisis’s impact on firm performance. On the contrary, risk-taking was not identified as a significant contributor in this context. These findings highlight the importance of specific entrepreneurial behaviors in uncertain and disruptive conditions. Practical implications: The study provides practical guidance for business owners and managers ope- rating in crisis environments. Proactiveness and innovativeness should be considered critical entrepre- neurial strategies to enhance resilience and firm performance. Moreover, the findings emphasize the value of leveraging crisis experiences to make future entrepreneurial decisions in in hostile environments. Originality/value: This study contributes to the literature on entrepreneurial orientation by introducing a novel methodological approach based on subjective evaluations of EO dimensions during a crisis. By addressing the gap in ex-post assessments of entrepreneurial behaviors under hostile conditions, this research provides both practical and theoretical insights into how EO can support firms in effectively navigating crises.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcin Suder, 2024. "Which Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation Drive Firm Performance in Hostile Environments? Lessons From the Pandemic Crisis," European Management Studies, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 22(105), pages 22-48.
  • Handle: RePEc:sgm:emswzu:v:22:i:105:y:2024:p:22-48
    DOI: 10.7172/1644-9584.105.2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://press.wz.uw.edu.pl/ems/vol22/iss3/2/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.7172/1644-9584.105.2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    entrepreneurial orientation; risk-taking; innovativeness; proactiveness; firm performance; crisis management; hostile environments; retrospective evaluation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgm:emswzu:v:22:i:105:y:2024:p:22-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask the person in charge to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/somuwpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.