IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgh/gosnar/y2012i5-6p119-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uwarunkowania ładu spontanicznego i stanowionego w gospodarce Polski okresu transformacji

Author

Listed:
  • Anna E. Grabska

Abstract

Celem artykułu jest analiza wybranych uwarunkowań ładu gospodarczego w Polsce odpowiadającego założeniom dwóch teorii kształtowania ładu – teorii ładu spontanicznego F.A. Hayeka oraz teorii ładu stanowionego W. Euckena. W ramach realizacji celu głównego analizie poddano wartości i preferencje polskiego społeczeństwa w początkowych latach transformacji pod kątem ich dopasowania do dwóch powyższych modeli kształtowania ładu gospodarczego. Realizacja tak sformułowanego celu wymagała analizy źródeł wtórnych, w tym literatury fachowej i raportów z międzynarodowych badań empirycznych. Z przeprowadzonej analizy wynika, że warunkiem sprawnego i efektywnego funkcjonowania ram wyznaczających ład gospodarczy zarówno w ujęciu Euckena, jak i Hayeka jest ich akceptacja przez społeczeństwo. Z kolei akceptacja reguł ładu i zaangażowanie w ich tworzenie zależy od poziomu dostosowania procesu tworzenia ładu i jego reguł do wartości i preferencji społeczeństwa. Z rozważań prezentujących wybrane wyniki badań mentalności, systemów preferencji i wartości polskiego społeczeństwa w początkowym okresie transformacji wynika, że było ono relatywnie bardziej predysponowane do akceptacji stanowionego modelu kształtowania ładu gospodarczego autorstwa W. Euckena. Uwarunkowania kulturowe, takie jak: duża nieufność wobec władzy formalnej, wysokie oczekiwania od życia, brak zdolności do współpracy, wysoki dystans władzy, niski etos pracy, pragnienie szybkiego wzbogacenia się, a jednocześnie niewielkie doświadczenie w funkcjonowaniu gospodarki rynkowej w tylko ograniczonym stopniu predysponowały polską gospodarkę do wyboru oddolnego modelu kształtowania ładu gospodarczego.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna E. Grabska, 2012. "Uwarunkowania ładu spontanicznego i stanowionego w gospodarce Polski okresu transformacji," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 5-6, pages 119-140.
  • Handle: RePEc:sgh:gosnar:y:2012:i:5-6:p:119-140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.journalssystem.com/gna/pdf-101039-32990
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claudia R. Williamson & Carrie B. Kerekes, 2011. "Securing Private Property: Formal versus Informal Institutions," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 54(3), pages 537-572.
    2. Licht, Amir N. & Goldschmidt, Chanan & Schwartz, Shalom H., 2005. "Culture, Law, and Corporate Governance," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 229-255, June.
    3. Stefano Fiori, 2002. "Alternative Visions of Change in Douglass North’s New Institutionalism," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 1025-1043, December.
    4. North, Douglass C, 1994. "Economic Performance through Time," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(3), pages 359-368, June.
    5. Steve Pejovich, 2003. "Understanding the transaction costs of transition: it's the culture, stupid," ICER Working Papers 24-2003, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
    6. Svetozar Pejovich, 2003. "Understanding the Transaction Costs of Transition: it's the Culture, Stupid," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 16(4), pages 347-361, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zweynert, Joachim & Goldschmidt, Nils, 2005. "The Two Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe and the Relation between Path Dependent and Politically Implemented Institutional Change," Discussion Paper Series 26391, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.
    2. Claudia Williamson, 2009. "Informal institutions rule: institutional arrangements and economic performance," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 371-387, June.
    3. Stephan F. Gohmann, 2012. "Institutions, Latent Entrepreneurship, and Self–Employment: An International Comparison," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 36(2), pages 295-321, March.
    4. Claudia Williamson & Rachel Mathers, 2011. "Economic freedom, culture, and growth," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 148(3), pages 313-335, September.
    5. Zweynert, Joachim & Goldschmidt, Nils, 2005. "The Two Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe and the Relation between Path Dependent and Politically Implemented Institutional Change," HWWA Discussion Papers 314, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).
    6. Judit Kozenkow, 2013. "New institutional economics: Foundations and latest trends," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 35(1), pages 87-101, April.
    7. Nikolay Wenzel, 2007. "Ideology, constitutional culture and institutional change: the EU constitution as reflection of Europe’s emergent postmodernism," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 2(3), pages 25-47, September.
    8. Peter J. Boettke & Ennio Piano, 2016. "Baumol’s productive and unproductive entrepreneurship after 25 years," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(2), pages 130-144, August.
    9. Zweynert, Joachim & Goldschmidt, Nils, 2005. "The Two Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe and the Relation between Path Dependent and Politically Implemented Institutional Change," Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 05/3, Walter Eucken Institut e.V..
    10. Tarabar, Danko, 2017. "Culture, democracy, and market reforms: Evidence from transition countries," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 456-480.
    11. O. Yul Kwon, 2005. "A Cultural Analysis of South Korea's Economic Prospects," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 213-231.
    12. Valentina Vučković & Ružica Šimić Banović & Martina Basarac Sertić, 2021. "Governance Trends among New EU Member States: Is There Institutional Convergence?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-15, December.
    13. Michel Zouboulakis, 2010. "Trustworthiness as a Moral Determinant of Economic Activity: Lessons from the Classics," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 209-221, January.
    14. Neyapti, Bilin & Arasil, Yavuz, 2016. "The nexus of economic and institutional evolution," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 574-582.
    15. Angela Ambrosino & Magda Fontana & Anna Azzurra Gigante, 2018. "Shifting Boundaries In Economics: The Institutional Cognitive Strand And The Future Of Institutional Economics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 767-791, July.
    16. Vladan Ivanovic & Endrit Lami & Drini Imami, 2023. "Political Budget Cycles in Early Versus Regular Elections: The Case of Serbia," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 65(3), pages 551-581, September.
    17. Marcus Matthias Keupp, 2021. "Effectiveness of Military Performance," Springer Books, in: Defense Economics, chapter 0, pages 67-91, Springer.
    18. Dimiter IALNAZOV & Nikolay NENOVSKY, 2010. "The Evolution of Post-Communist Countries: An Interpretation from the Perspective of Cooperation," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 1600, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    19. Peter J. Boettke & Christopher J. Coyne & Peter T. Leeson, 2015. "Institutional stickiness and the New Development Economics," Chapters, in: Laura E. Grube & Virgil Henry Storr (ed.), Culture and Economic Action, chapter 6, pages 123-146, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Peter Boettke & Emily Chamlee‐Wright & Peter Gordon & Sanford Ikeda & Peter T. Leeson & Russell Sobel, 2007. "The Political, Economic, and Social Aspects of Katrina," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 74(2), pages 363-376, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    transformacja; ład gospodarczy; wartości i preferencje społeczeństwa;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Modern Monetary Theory;
    • D71 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgh:gosnar:y:2012:i:5-6:p:119-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Grzegorz Konat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sgwawpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.