IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgh/annals/i40y2016p357-370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinanty wyboru notacji modelowania procesów biznesowych

Author

Listed:
  • Renata Gabryelczyk

    (Uniwersytet Warszawski)

  • Arkadiusz Jurczuk

    (Politechnika Białostocka)

  • Marek Pęczkowski

    (Uniwersytet Warszawski)

Abstract

The article explores the problem of assessing a model’s quality as an important element of Business Process Modelling projects. The purpose of this paper is to present the concept of assessment of attributes of selected Business Process Modelling Notations determining the choice of the notation technique that is the easiest to understand. The concept of attribute assessment and measuring understandability is based on desk research and tests performed on a sample of 266 respondents without experience in business process modelling. The analysis of understandability of business processes notation (EPC, BPMS, BPMN) has been carried out using comprehension tests. The analysis of attributes determining the choice of the most easily understandable notation has been carried out using a statistical test. These studies led to recommendations for process-oriented projects where the primary goal is to describe the process in the most suitable notation in order to meet the needs of key project stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Renata Gabryelczyk & Arkadiusz Jurczuk & Marek Pęczkowski, 2016. "Determinanty wyboru notacji modelowania procesów biznesowych," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 40, pages 357-370.
    • Handle: RePEc:sgh:annals:i:40:y:2016:p:357-370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rocznikikae.sgh.waw.pl/p/roczniki_kae_z40_26.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgh:annals:i:40:y:2016:p:357-370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michał Bernardelli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sgwawpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.