IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgh/annals/i36y2015p205-220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process measurement as a constituent of the evaluation of IT systems implementation in public administration

Author

Listed:
  • Renata Gabryelczyk

    (Uniwersytet Warszawski)

  • Elżbieta Rakowska

    (Kancelaria Sejmu RP)

Abstract

Legal requirements and principles of New Public Management impose on public administration an obligation to continuously improve its work using efficiency increasing methods. The expediency and efficiency of public expenditure should directly concern the implementation and reorganisation of IT systems for governmental departments, stressing the need for reviews of the existing systems with the purpose of meeting the needs of service users and assessing their effectiveness and efficiency. Researchers examining the economic evaluation of IT projects in public administration do not use uniform methods. The article focuses on one example from a finance unit in the public sector, i.e. the finance department in the Chancellery of the Sejm (Polish parliament); it is indicated that the use of a process approach in the reorganisation of the IT systems in this department could provide quick wins thanks to lower costs and the resulting efficiency gains. Defining indicators and the measurement of processes can be a useful constituent in the evaluation of IT systems implementation and it provides economic arguments for running projects aimed at exploiting the potential of ERP systems more fully.

Suggested Citation

  • Renata Gabryelczyk & Elżbieta Rakowska, 2015. "Process measurement as a constituent of the evaluation of IT systems implementation in public administration," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 36, pages 205-220.
  • Handle: RePEc:sgh:annals:i:36:y:2015:p:205-220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rocznikikae.sgh.waw.pl/p/roczniki_kae_z36_14.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgh:annals:i:36:y:2015:p:205-220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michał Bernardelli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sgwawpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.