IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sen/rebelj/v57i3y2012p316-327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining a Quantitative Approach of Planning and Control with a Lean Approach: Reflections on a Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • J. Wijngaard

Abstract

A lean approach is idealizing and participative. Applying it to production planning and control has to be directed to the removal of inventory, to the application of “pull†, to a smooth flow and to a high participation of all people involved, through the use of standard tools. This seems to conflict with a quantitative approach of production planning and control. Such an approach starts with the acceptance of certain supply and manufacturing restrictions and is directed to properly dealing with these restrictions. The concept trade-off is very important in this approach. A key for a good co-existence of the two approaches may be the concept regularity. Flow is a form of regularity. It is not always possible to organize flow in all parts of the operation, but it is always possible (and necessary) to strive for regularity. And it is generally possible to realize a high degree of regularity. So, if regularity is stressed instead of flow, the two approaches may co-exist more comfortable. Cyclic schedules are an important form of regularity, especially in the semi-process industry. This paper reflects on a case study where the design and implementation of cyclic schedules in a semi-process plant is embedded in a company-wide lean improvement programme.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Wijngaard, 2012. "Combining a Quantitative Approach of Planning and Control with a Lean Approach: Reflections on a Case Study," Review of Business and Economic Literature, Intersentia, vol. 57(3), pages 316-327, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sen:rebelj:v:57:i:3:y:2012:p:316-327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sen:rebelj:v:57:i:3:y:2012:p:316-327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Petra Van den Bempt (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.rebel-journal.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.