IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sen/journl/vlviy2011i3p288-309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Credibility of Fiscal Policies and Independent Fiscal Bodies

Author

Listed:
  • F. Naert

Abstract

In this paper we address the problem of credibility in fiscal policy. In many instances fiscal policy as conducted by governments is not perceived as credible. The targets set forward by government are often not met and usually the divergence is on the negative side. Taxes are overestimated and spending is underestimated, leading to a deficit bias and growing government debts. To enhance the credibility of fiscal policy several schemes are put forward. Most frequently used are fiscal rules that replace discretionary decision making. Fiscal rules however are difficult to sanction and although they can improve the quality of fiscal policy, they do not guarantee sound fiscal policy. Therefore it is sometimes suggested to install fiscal councils on top of the fiscal rules. Fiscal councils with tasks in forecasting and assessing fiscal policy have been and are being introduced in more and more countries. Some economists want to go further however and propose to establish fiscal councils with independent powers to conduct fiscal policy within the limits that parliament lays down. The central research themes of this paper are the questions whether and how fiscal rules and independent fiscal institutions can improve the credibility of fiscal policy. The first research question can be answered affirmatively given the experience in monetary and regulatory policy. Regarding the second research question the challenge is to disentangle the distributional from the stabilization elements in fiscal policy. If that can be done stabilization could be delegated to an independent fiscal body while distribution should remain a political prerogative.

Suggested Citation

  • F. Naert, 2011. "Credibility of Fiscal Policies and Independent Fiscal Bodies," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Intersentia, vol. 0(3), pages 288-309, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sen:journl:v:lvi:y:2011:i:3:p:288-309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sen:journl:v:lvi:y:2011:i:3:p:288-309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Petra Van den Bempt (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.crninet.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.