IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/seh/journl/y1998i15p15-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eficiencia económica e instituciones agrarias

Author

Listed:
  • Amit Bhaduri

    (Jawaharlal Nehru University)

Abstract

The paper shows that explanations in terms of economic models should be embedded in institutions in order to understand economic phenomena in a given historical situation. Thus, the way in which institutions and institutional changes are addressed from a neo-classic economic point of view is reviewed. In particular, it is argued that such a method fails to consider the market as an actual institution where the participants are by no means equal in terms of economic power. Examples from Indian agriculture are used to show that both agrarian credit and the product market exhibit arrangements and characteristics which are best explained as consequences of the unequal distribution of economic power. As an alternative to analysing economic institutions, the author puts forward the concept of class efficiency. Any institutional arrangement is considered class efficient when the most powerful class can maintain a higher income in its favour, despite the lower productive efficiency of the system. To conclude, institutions consider efficiency to be a useful concept to analyse agrarian institutions in backward regions, provided it is not mechanically understood as devoid of individual agency.

Suggested Citation

  • Amit Bhaduri, 1998. "Eficiencia económica e instituciones agrarias," Historia Agraria. Revista de Agricultura e Historia Rural, Sociedad Española de Historia Agraria, issue 15, pages 15-25.
  • Handle: RePEc:seh:journl:y:1998:i:15:p:15-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repositori.uji.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10234/116522/HA15-1.pdf?sequence=1
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic efficiency; agrarian institutions; economic models; institutional changes;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • P48 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - Legal Institutions; Property Rights; Natural Resources; Energy; Environment; Regional Studies
    • Q02 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Commodity Market
    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:seh:journl:y:1998:i:15:p:15-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vicente Pinilla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sehiaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.