IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sdo/regaec/v30y2021i3_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Slow tourism, public funding and economic development. A critical review on the case of the Way of St. James in Galicia

Author

Listed:
  • Moscarelli, Rosella

Abstract

The analysis of the economic dimension relating to the Way of St. James is confronted in a double reflection. On the one hand, the intention is to reconstruct the public funds that have supported the project to relaunch the Way over the years. On the other hand, we discuss one of the impacts of the route on the territory - that relating to economic development following the “second coming” of tourism. The analysis of both aspects shows rather unexpected results. In the first case it is shown how slow tourism projects can be real priority axes on which to concentrate large public funds. The second calls into question the effective ability of a path, albeit with significant tourist flows, to activate demographic recovery and to improve economic conditions. However, the need is discussed to investigate the question in greater detail which, if analyzed in the various parts, really shows the importance, not only economic, that the process of development of the Way has entailed for the territory it passes through.

Suggested Citation

  • Moscarelli, Rosella, 2021. "Slow tourism, public funding and economic development. A critical review on the case of the Way of St. James in Galicia," Revista Galega de Economía, University of Santiago de Compostela. Faculty of Economics and Business., vol. 30(3), pages 1-16.
  • Handle: RePEc:sdo:regaec:v:30:y:2021:i:3_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.usc.gal/index.php/rge/article/view/7522
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Slow tourism; territorial development; public funds;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z32 - Other Special Topics - - Tourism Economics - - - Tourism and Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sdo:regaec:v:30:y:2021:i:3_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marisa Chas-Amil (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feusces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.