IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sdo/regaec/v25y2016i3_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Specially Protected Natural Areas Of Regions Of The Southern Federal District Of Russia: Specificity Of Approaches To Management And Conservation

Author

Listed:
  • I.V. Mitrofanova
  • G.I. Starokozheva
  • E.A. Shkarupa
  • V.V. Batmanova
  • I.A. Mitrofanova
  • A.B. Tlisov

Abstract

It is indispensible to pay a particular attention to the regional aspect of creation, functioning and management of the specially protected natural areas at the study of the natural resource use in the economic districts of Russia and some Russian regions. The share of the net of the specially protected natural areas is 11,7% of the surface of the Russian Federation. Under the conditions of a new geoeconomic zonation they create their ecological frame, play an important role in the solution of the problems of the conservation of the biological diversity at the process of the accelerating the neo industrialization of the economic life of regions. In these territories the maintenance of the stability of the natural area is provided with the help of special natural use and territory protection regimes. In the article it is shown which types of the specially protected natural areas exist in the Southern Federal District of Russia, their specificity, the specific managerial approaches are analyzed and variants of their modernization are offered.

Suggested Citation

  • I.V. Mitrofanova & G.I. Starokozheva & E.A. Shkarupa & V.V. Batmanova & I.A. Mitrofanova & A.B. Tlisov, 2016. "Specially Protected Natural Areas Of Regions Of The Southern Federal District Of Russia: Specificity Of Approaches To Management And Conservation," Revista Galega de Economía, University of Santiago de Compostela. Faculty of Economics and Business., vol. 25(3), pages 57-68.
    • Handle: RePEc:sdo:regaec:v:25:y:2016:i:3_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.usc.gal/index.php/rge/article/view/3792
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kallis, Giorgos & Norgaard, Richard B., 2010. "Coevolutionary ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 690-699, February.
    2. I.V. Mitrofanova & G.I. Starokozheva & I.A. Mitrofanova & E.A. Shkarupa & V.V. Batmanova, 2015. "Ecological External Effects of the Functioning of the Economic Complex of the South of Russia," Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 15(1), pages 93-110.
    3. Murtaza, Niaz, 2011. "Pursuing self-interest or self-actualization? From capitalism to a steady-state, wisdom economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 577-584, February.
    4. Finger, Robert & Buchmann, Nina, 2015. "An ecological economic assessment of risk-reducing effects of species diversity in managed grasslands," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 89-97.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goddard, Jessica J. & Kallis, Giorgos & Norgaard, Richard B., 2019. "Keeping multiple antennae up: Coevolutionary foundations for methodological pluralism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Gill Seyfang & Alex Haxeltine, 2012. "Growing Grassroots Innovations: Exploring the Role of Community-Based Initiatives in Governing Sustainable Energy Transitions," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(3), pages 381-400, June.
    3. Matin, Nilufar & Forrester, John & Ensor, Jonathan, 2018. "What is equitable resilience?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 197-205.
    4. Daniel Coq-Huelva & Angie Higuchi & Rafaela Alfalla-Luque & Ricardo Burgos-Morán & Ruth Arias-Gutiérrez, 2017. "Co-Evolution and Bio-Social Construction: The Kichwa Agroforestry Systems ( Chakras ) in the Ecuadorian Amazonia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Nhu Tuyên Lê & Marjolijn Bloemmen & Roxana Bobulescu & Claudio Vitari, 2015. "Microeconomic degrowth: The case of Community Supported Agriculture," Post-Print halshs-01923276, HAL.
    6. Magrini, Marie-Benoit & Anton, Marc & Cholez, Célia & Corre-Hellou, Guenaelle & Duc, Gérard & Jeuffroy, Marie-Hélène & Meynard, Jean-Marc & Pelzer, Elise & Voisin, Anne-Sophie & Walrand, Stéphane, 2016. "Why are grain-legumes rarely present in cropping systems despite their environmental and nutritional benefits? Analyzing lock-in in the French agrifood system," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 152-162.
    7. Angelo Antoci & Simone Borghesi & Gerardo Marletto, 2012. "To drive or not to drive? A simple evolutionary model," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2012(2), pages 31-47.
    8. Alessandro Vercelli & Eric Clark & Andrew Gouldson, 2016. "Finance and Sustainability Synthesis Report of WP7," Working papers wpaper166, Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.
    9. Ríos-Núñez, Sandra M. & Coq-Huelva, Daniel & García-Trujillo, Roberto, 2013. "The Spanish livestock model: A coevolutionary analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 342-350.
    10. Wolfgang Onyeali & Michael P. Schlaile & Bastian Winkler, 2023. "Navigating the Biocosmos: Cornerstones of a Bioeconomic Utopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-32, June.
    11. Matías Membiela-Pollán & María Alló-Pazos & Carlos Pateiro-Rodríguez & Félix Blázquez-Lozano, 2019. "The Inefficiency of the Neoclassical Paradigm in the Promotion of Subjective Well-Being and Socioeconomic, and Environmental Sustainability: An Empirical Test for the Spanish Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Catherine Dezio & Davide Marino, 2018. "Towards an Impact Evaluation Framework to Measure Urban Resilience in Food Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    13. Papirakis, Rachel, 2022. "Auditors’ self-actualization and ability to resist client pressure: Evidence from Canada," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    14. Luca Salvati & Margherita Carlucci & Pere Serra & Ilaria Zambon, 2019. "Demographic Transitions and Socioeconomic Development in Italy, 1862–2009: A Brief Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, January.
    15. Manning, Stephan & Boons, Frank & von Hagen, Oliver & Reinecke, Juliane, 2012. "National contexts matter: The co-evolution of sustainability standards in global value chains," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 197-209.
    16. Valentine P. Vishnevsky & Alexey V. Polovyan, 2016. "Fiscal or monetary stimulus? Evolutionary arguments for tax reforms," Journal of Tax Reform, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 2(3), pages 208-226.
    17. Bliss, Sam & Egler, Megan, 2020. "Ecological Economics Beyond Markets," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    18. François Bareille & Pierre Dupraz, 2017. "Biodiversity Productive Capacity in Mixed Farms of North-West of France: a Multi-output Primal System," Working Papers SMART 17-03, INRAE UMR SMART.
    19. François Bareille & Pierre Dupraz, 2020. "Productive Capacity of Biodiversity: Crop Diversity and Permanent Grasslands in Northwestern France," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 77(2), pages 365-399, October.
    20. Daniels, Silvie & Witters, Nele & Beliën, Tim & Vrancken, Kristof & Vangronsveld, Jaco & Van Passel, Steven, 2017. "Monetary Valuation of Natural Predators for Biological Pest Control in Pear Production," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 160-173.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sdo:regaec:v:25:y:2016:i:3_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marisa Chas-Amil (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feusces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.