IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sdo/regaec/v25y2016i3_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Specially Protected Natural Areas Of Regions Of The Southern Federal District Of Russia: Specificity Of Approaches To Management And Conservation

Author

Listed:
  • I.V. Mitrofanova
  • G.I. Starokozheva
  • E.A. Shkarupa
  • V.V. Batmanova
  • I.A. Mitrofanova
  • A.B. Tlisov

Abstract

It is indispensible to pay a particular attention to the regional aspect of creation, functioning and management of the specially protected natural areas at the study of the natural resource use in the economic districts of Russia and some Russian regions. The share of the net of the specially protected natural areas is 11,7% of the surface of the Russian Federation. Under the conditions of a new geoeconomic zonation they create their ecological frame, play an important role in the solution of the problems of the conservation of the biological diversity at the process of the accelerating the neo industrialization of the economic life of regions. In these territories the maintenance of the stability of the natural area is provided with the help of special natural use and territory protection regimes. In the article it is shown which types of the specially protected natural areas exist in the Southern Federal District of Russia, their specificity, the specific managerial approaches are analyzed and variants of their modernization are offered.

Suggested Citation

  • I.V. Mitrofanova & G.I. Starokozheva & E.A. Shkarupa & V.V. Batmanova & I.A. Mitrofanova & A.B. Tlisov, 2016. "Specially Protected Natural Areas Of Regions Of The Southern Federal District Of Russia: Specificity Of Approaches To Management And Conservation," Revista Galega de Economía, University of Santiago de Compostela. Faculty of Economics and Business., vol. 25(3), pages 57-68.
    • Handle: RePEc:sdo:regaec:v:25:y:2016:i:3_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.usc.gal/index.php/rge/article/view/3792
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. I.V. Mitrofanova & G.I. Starokozheva & I.A. Mitrofanova & E.A. Shkarupa & V.V. Batmanova, 2015. "Ecological External Effects of the Functioning of the Economic Complex of the South of Russia," Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 15(1), pages 93-110.
    2. Finger, Robert & Buchmann, Nina, 2015. "An ecological economic assessment of risk-reducing effects of species diversity in managed grasslands," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 89-97.
    3. Kallis, Giorgos & Norgaard, Richard B., 2010. "Coevolutionary ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 690-699, February.
    4. Murtaza, Niaz, 2011. "Pursuing self-interest or self-actualization? From capitalism to a steady-state, wisdom economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 577-584, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goddard, Jessica J. & Kallis, Giorgos & Norgaard, Richard B., 2019. "Keeping multiple antennae up: Coevolutionary foundations for methodological pluralism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Gill Seyfang & Alex Haxeltine, 2012. "Growing Grassroots Innovations: Exploring the Role of Community-Based Initiatives in Governing Sustainable Energy Transitions," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(3), pages 381-400, June.
    3. Magrini, Marie-Benoit & Anton, Marc & Cholez, Célia & Corre-Hellou, Guenaelle & Duc, Gérard & Jeuffroy, Marie-Hélène & Meynard, Jean-Marc & Pelzer, Elise & Voisin, Anne-Sophie & Walrand, Stéphane, 2016. "Why are grain-legumes rarely present in cropping systems despite their environmental and nutritional benefits? Analyzing lock-in in the French agrifood system," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 152-162.
    4. Angelo Antoci & Simone Borghesi & Gerardo Marletto, 2012. "To drive or not to drive? A simple evolutionary model," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2012(2), pages 31-47.
    5. Ríos-Núñez, Sandra M. & Coq-Huelva, Daniel & García-Trujillo, Roberto, 2013. "The Spanish livestock model: A coevolutionary analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 342-350.
    6. Catherine Dezio & Davide Marino, 2018. "Towards an Impact Evaluation Framework to Measure Urban Resilience in Food Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Papirakis, Rachel, 2022. "Auditors’ self-actualization and ability to resist client pressure: Evidence from Canada," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    8. Valentine P. Vishnevsky & Alexey V. Polovyan, 2016. "Fiscal or monetary stimulus? Evolutionary arguments for tax reforms," Journal of Tax Reform, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 2(3), pages 208-226.
    9. Bliss, Sam & Egler, Megan, 2020. "Ecological Economics Beyond Markets," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    10. François Bareille & Pierre Dupraz, 2020. "Productive Capacity of Biodiversity: Crop Diversity and Permanent Grasslands in Northwestern France," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 77(2), pages 365-399, October.
    11. Yu Yi & Hu Yimei & Qiao Han & Wang Shouyang, 2018. "Co-evolution: A New Perspective for Business Model Innovation," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 6(5), pages 385-398, October.
    12. Géraldine THIRY & Philippe ROMAN, 2015. "L’indice de richesse inclusive : l’économie Mainstream au-delà de ses limites, mais en deçà de la soutenabilité ?," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2015001, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    13. Remig, Moritz C., 2017. "Structured pluralism in ecological economics — A reply to Peter Söderbaum's commentary," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 533-537.
    14. Spash, Clive L., 2013. "The shallow or the deep ecological economics movement?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 351-362.
    15. Foxon, Timothy J., 2011. "A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(12), pages 2258-2267.
    16. Jianhua Wang & Yongping Wei & Shan Jiang & Yong Zhao & Yuyan Zhou & Weihua Xiao, 2017. "Understanding the Human-Water Relationship in China during 722 B.C.-1911 A.D. from a Contradiction and Co-Evolutionary Perspective," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(3), pages 929-943, February.
    17. Dube, Benjamin, 2021. "Why cross and mix disciplines and methodologies?: Multiple meanings of Interdisciplinarity and pluralism in ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    18. Clive L. Spash, 2012. "Towards the Integration of Social, Economic and Ecological Knowledge," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Julien-François Gerber & Rolf Steppacher (ed.), Towards an Integrated Paradigm in Heterodox Economics, chapter 1, pages 26-46, Palgrave Macmillan.
    19. Christoph Heinzel, 2013. "Schumpeter and Georgescu-Roegen on the foundations of an evolutionary analysis," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 37(2), pages 251-271.
    20. Kussel, Gerhard, 2016. "Adaptation to climate variability: Evidence from German households," Ruhr Economic Papers 625, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sdo:regaec:v:25:y:2016:i:3_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marisa Chas-Amil (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feusces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.