IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/wnewec/y2016i4p98-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ИЗУЧЕНИЕ БЫСТРОРАСТУЩИХ КОМПАНИЙ - НОВЫЙ ИНСТРУМЕНТ МИКРОЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОГО АНАЛИЗА // The Study of Growing Companies as a New Tool of Microeconomic Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • E. Baranova I.

    (Financial University)

  • Е. Баранова И.

    (Финансовый университет)

Abstract

The article regards rapidly growing companies as a tool for the analysis of micro-economic development. The objective of the paper is to identify ways to apply information about fast-growing companies in the management of economic processes, to prove that the study of growing companies has become a new tool and method of microeconomic analysis and a way to identify economically active regions, industries and sub-industries. The article analyzes the existing approaches to the definition of high-growth companies, notes the spheres of application, advantages and disadvantages of these approaches. It is concluded that the applicability of the “soft” selection criteria of fast-growing companies is to identifying centers of economic growth, while the “hard” criteria allow to study the most successful companies and to identify strategies for success. The use of “hard” criterion makes the analysis of fast-growing companies a valuable tool for the study of entrepreneurship. Fast-growing companies, selected according to this criterion, are empirical approximation of the theoretical concepts of entrepreneurial firms. В статье рассматриваются быстрорастущие компании как инструмент анализа микроэкономического развития. Цель работы - выявить пути применения информации о быстрорастущих компаниях в управлении экономическими процессами, доказать, что изучение быстрорастущих компаний стало новым инструментом микроэкономического анализа и способом выявления экономически активных регионов, отраслей и суботраслей. В статье проведен анализ существующих подходов к определению быстрорастущих компаний, отмечены области применения, преимущества и недостатки данных подходов. Сделан вывод о применимости «мягких» критериев отбора быстрорастущих компаний для выявления очагов роста экономики, тогда как «жесткие» критерии позволяют изучить наиболее успешные компании, выявить стратегии успеха. Использование «жесткого» критерия превращает анализ быстрорастущих компаний в ценный инструмент изучения предпринимательства. Быстрорастущие компании, отобранные согласно данному критерию, представляют собой эмпирическую аппроксимацию теоретического понятия предпринимательской фирмы.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Baranova I. & Е. Баранова И., 2016. "ИЗУЧЕНИЕ БЫСТРОРАСТУЩИХ КОМПАНИЙ - НОВЫЙ ИНСТРУМЕНТ МИКРОЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОГО АНАЛИЗА // The Study of Growing Companies as a New Tool of Microeconomic Analysis," Мир новой экономики // The world of new economy, Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Governtment оf The Russian Federation, issue 4, pages 98-104.
    • Handle: RePEc:scn:wnewec:y:2016:i:4:p:98-104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://wne.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/101/102.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Delmar, Frederic & Davidsson, Per & Gartner, William B., 2003. "Arriving at the high-growth firm," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 189-216, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Myint Moe Chit, 2018. "Political openness and the growth of small and medium enterprises: empirical evidence from transition economies," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 781-804, September.
    2. Serban Mogos & Alex Davis & Rui Baptista, 2021. "High and sustainable growth: persistence, volatility, and survival of high growth firms," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(1), pages 135-161, March.
    3. Stefano Bianchini & Giulio Bottazzi & Federico Tamagni, 2017. "What does (not) characterize persistent corporate high-growth?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 633-656, March.
    4. Florian Léon, 2022. "The elusive quest for high-growth firms in Africa: when other metrics of performance say nothing," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 225-246, January.
    5. Bianchini, Stefano & Pellegrino, Gabriele, 2019. "Innovation persistence and employment dynamics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 1171-1186.
    6. Fredriksen, Lars & Wennberg, Karl & Balachandran, Chanchal, 2015. "Mobility and Entrepreneurship: Evaluating the scope of knowledge-based theories of entrepreneurship," Ratio Working Papers 266, The Ratio Institute.
    7. Fabio Bertoni & María Ferrer & José Martí, 2013. "The different roles played by venture capital and private equity investors on the investment activity of their portfolio firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 607-633, April.
    8. Xaver Neumeyer & Susana C. Santos & Michael H. Morris, 2019. "Who is left out: exploring social boundaries in entrepreneurial ecosystems," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 462-484, April.
    9. Erik Lundmark & Anna Krzeminska & Dean A. Shepherd, 2019. "Images of Entrepreneurship: Exploring Root Metaphors and Expanding Upon Them," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(1), pages 138-170, January.
    10. Georgios Palaiologos & Zainab Al Khunaizi, 2017. "Growing the Arab Family Business (1): Hybrid Organizational Arrangements," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Innovation, Macrothink Institute, Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Innovation, vol. 4(1), pages 2546-2546, December.
    11. Maria Tunberg & Alistair R. Anderson, 2020. "Growing a small firm; experiences and managing difficult processes," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1445-1463, December.
    12. Partanen, Jukka & Kohtamäki, Marko & Patel, Pankaj C. & Parida, Vinit, 2020. "Supply chain ambidexterity and manufacturing SME performance: The moderating roles of network capability and strategic information flow," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    13. Kaya, Mehmet Caglar & Persson, Lars, 2019. "A theory of gazelle growth: Competition, venture capital finance and policy," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    14. Mario BENASSI & Matteo LANDONI & Francesco RENTOCCHINI, 2017. "University Management Practices and Academic Spin-offs," Departmental Working Papers 2017-11, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    15. Alex Coad & Julian Frankish & Richard G. Roberts & David J. Storey, 2011. "Growth Paths and Survival Chances," SPRU Working Paper Series 195, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    16. Petra Andries & Ute Stephan, 2019. "Environmental Innovation and Firm Performance: How Firm Size and Motives Matter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-17, June.
    17. Watson, John, 2007. "Modeling the relationship between networking and firm performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 852-874, November.
    18. Stephan Weemaes & Johan Bruneel & Ann Gaeremynck & Jonas Debrulle, 2022. "Initial external knowledge sources and start-up growth," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 523-540, January.
    19. Alex Coad, 2007. "Exploring the "mechanics" of firm growth: evidence from a short-panel VAR," Post-Print halshs-00175048, HAL.
    20. Laure-Anne Parpaleix, 2016. "Innovation and growth potential: managing investment in middle market companies," Post-Print hal-01496274, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:wnewec:y:2016:i:4:p:98-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://worldneweconomy.elpub.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.