IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/wnewec/y2016i2p103-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Российские Быстрорастущие Компании: Испытание Депрессией // Russia’S High-Growth Companies: Tested Through Depression

Author

Listed:
  • YURY Polunin ALEKSEEVICH

    (journal «Expert»)

  • ANDREY Yudanov YURJEVICH

    (Financial University)

  • Ю. Полунин А.

    (журнал «Эксперт»)

  • А. Юданов Ю.

    (Финансового университета)

Abstract

The search for the new growth factors of the Russian economy acquired special importance under the conditions of the today’s prolonged depression. According to international studies the high-growth companies (gazelles) act at the micro-economic level as the decisive factor of the growth of the GDP and employment. In the article is carried out the empirical estimation of the number of Russian population of gazelles and is examined thestylized life cycle of the high-growth firm. It is established that in the pre-crisis years the population of gazelles inthis country strongly exceeded the corresponding level of the developed countries. After 2008 gazelle’s population in Russia experienced a sharp reduction. Our study of the life cycle of the domestic of gazelles also confirmedtheir increased instability. The use of Birch index showed that in Russia the majority both the rapidly-growing and unsuccessfully developing firms are concentrated in one and the same branches (trade, building and other).Hypothesis is advanced, that the instability of the Russian gazelles is connected with the unfavorable business conditions in the goods producing sector of this economy. В условиях длительной депрессии особое значение приобрел поиск новых факторов роста российской экономики. Согласно международным исследованиям, на микроэкономическом уровне решающим фактором увеличения ВВП и занятости является популяция быстрорастущих компаний (фирм-газелей). В статье проведена эмпирическая оценка численности российской популяции газелей и рассмотрен типовой цикл жизни быстрорастущей фирмы. Установлено, что в предкризисные годы популяция газелей в стране в 3-4 раза превышала уровень развитых стран. Однако вопреки типичной для газелей других стран устойчивости к кризисам в России после 2008 г. их популяция испытала сверхрезкое, четырехкратное сокращение. Исследование цикла жизни отечественных газелей также подтвердило их повышенную неустойчивость. Вопреки распространенному мнению о существовании отраслей - локомотивов развития использование индекса Берча показало, что в России большинство как быстрорастущих, так и неудачно развивающихся фирм сосредоточено в одних и тех же отраслях (торговля, строительство и др.). Выдвинута гипотеза, что неустойчивость российских газелей объясняется неблагоприятными условиями ведения бизнеса в реальном секторе, и это ведет к повышенной концентрации быстрорастущих компаний в отраслях, не связанных с интенсивным созданием специфических активов.

Suggested Citation

  • YURY Polunin ALEKSEEVICH & ANDREY Yudanov YURJEVICH & Ю. Полунин А. & А. Юданов Ю., 2016. "Российские Быстрорастущие Компании: Испытание Депрессией // Russia’S High-Growth Companies: Tested Through Depression," Мир новой экономики // The world of new economy, Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Governtment оf The Russian Federation, issue 2, pages 103-112.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:wnewec:y:2016:i:2:p:103-112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://wne.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/75/76.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Werner Hölzl & Klaus Friesenbichler, 2010. "High-growth firms, innovation and the distance to the frontier," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 30(2), pages 1016-1024.
    2. Daron Acemoglu & Philippe Aghion & Fabrizio Zilibotti, 2006. "Distance to Frontier, Selection, and Economic Growth," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 4(1), pages 37-74, March.
    3. Alex Coad & Sven-Olov Daunfeldt & Werner Hölzl & Dan Johansson & Paul Nightingale, 2014. "High-growth firms: introduction to the special section," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 23(1), pages 91-112, February.
    4. David Neumark & Brandon Wall & Junfu Zhang, 2011. "Do Small Businesses Create More Jobs? New Evidence for the United States from the National Establishment Time Series," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 93(1), pages 16-29, August.
    5. John Haltiwanger & Ron S. Jarmin & Javier Miranda, 2013. "Who Creates Jobs? Small versus Large versus Young," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 95(2), pages 347-361, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristina Fernández & Roberta García & Paloma Lopez-Garcia & Benedicta Marzinotto & Roberta Serafini & Juuso Vanhala & Ladislav Wintr, 2017. "Firm growth in Europe: An overview based on the COMPNET labour module," BCL working papers 107, Central Bank of Luxembourg.
    2. Aradhna Aggarwal & Takahiro Sato, 2015. "Identifying High Growth Firms in India: An Alternative Approach," Discussion Paper Series DP2015-14, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    3. Marc Cowling & George Tanewski, 2019. "On the productive efficiency of Australian businesses: firm size and age class effects," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 739-752, October.
    4. Werner Hölzl & Susanne Bärenthaler-Sieber & Julia Bock-Schappelwein & Klaus Friesenbichler & Agnes Kügler & Andreas Reinstaller & Peter Reschenhofer & Bernhard Dachs & Martin Risak, 2019. "Digitalisation in Austria. State of Play and Reform Needs," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 61892.
    5. Caterina Santi & Pietro Santoleri, 2017. "Exploring the link between innovation and growth in Chilean firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 445-467, August.
    6. Szerb, László & Varga, Attila & Komlósi, Éva, 2017. "Gyors növekedésű vállalatok Magyarországon. Az innovatív, a rejtélyes és a virtuális gazellák [Fast-growing businesses in Hungary: The innovative, mysterious and virtual gazelles]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 476-506.
    7. Oznur Ozdamar & Eleftherios Giovanis & Sahizer Samuk, 2020. "State business relations and the dynamics of job flows in Egypt and Turkey," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 10(4), pages 519-558, December.
    8. Steven Bond‐Smith, 2022. "Discretely innovating: The effect of limited market contestability on innovation and growth," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 69(3), pages 301-327, July.
    9. Blessing Atwine & Ibrahim Mike Okumu & John Bosco Nnyanzi, 2023. "What drives the dynamics of employment growth in firms? Evidence from East Africa," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    10. Janghee Cho & Hyunbae Chun & Hongjun Kim & Yoonsoo Lee, 2017. "Job Creation and Destruction: New Evidence on the Role of Small Versus Young Firms in Korea," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 173-187, June.
    11. -, 2017. "La Encuesta Nacional de Dinámica de Empleo e Innovación (ENDEI) como herramienta de análisis: la innovación y el empleo en la industria manufacturera argentina," Documentos de Proyectos 42490, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    12. Aghion, Philippe & Akcigit, Ufuk & Howitt, Peter, 2014. "What Do We Learn From Schumpeterian Growth Theory?," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 515-563, Elsevier.
    13. Magnus Henrekson & Anders Kärnä & Tino Sanandaji, 2022. "Schumpeterian entrepreneurship: coveted by policymakers but impervious to top-down policymaking," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 867-890, July.
    14. Cassini, Lorenzo & Robert, Verónica, 2017. "Oportunidad versus complejidad en los procesos de aprendizaje: criterios para clasificación de sectores según los atributos de los regímenes sectoriales de innovación," Documentos de Proyectos 44135, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    15. Bianchini, Stefano & Pellegrino, Gabriele, 2019. "Innovation persistence and employment dynamics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 1171-1186.
    16. Freedman, Matthew & Khanna, Shantanu & Neumark, David, 2023. "Combining rules and discretion in economic development policy: Evidence on the impacts of the California Competes Tax Credit," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    17. Maria Tunberg & Alistair R. Anderson, 2020. "Growing a small firm; experiences and managing difficult processes," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1445-1463, December.
    18. Bernat, Gonzalo, 2017. "Innovación en la industria manufacturera argentina durante la post convertibilidad," Documentos de Proyectos 44132, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    19. Manuel Octavio Del Campo Villares & Vanessa Miguéns-Refojo & Francisco Jesús Ferreiro-Seoane, 2020. "Business Survival and the Influence of Innovation on Entrepreneurs in Business Incubators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, July.
    20. Boudreaux, Christopher, 2019. "Do private enterprises outperform state enterprises in an emerging market? The importance of institutional context in entrepreneurship," MPRA Paper 93039, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:wnewec:y:2016:i:2:p:103-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://worldneweconomy.elpub.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.