IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/financ/y2018i4p18-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Совершенствование Критериев Идентификации Системно Значимых Банков На Основе Кросс-Секторального Подхода // The Improvement Of Criteria For Identification Of Systemically Important Banks Based On Cross-Sectoral Approach

Author

Listed:
  • G. Gospodarchuk G.

    (Lobachevsky National Research Nizhny Novgorod State university)

  • E. Suchkova O.

    (National Research university “Higher School of Economics”)

  • Г. Господарчук Г.

    (Национальный исследовательский Нижегородский государственный университет им. Н.И. Лобачевского)

  • Е. Сучкова О.

    (Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»)

Abstract

In this article, the authors investigate the current theoretical and methodological approaches to the identification of systemically important banks, taking into account the specifics of national economies. The purpose of our study is an elaboration of criteria for the identification of systemically important banks at the national level. It creates a platform for the use of a proportional approach to the regulation of their activities. We used a cross- sectoral approach. It is based on the use of methods of induction and cluster analysis, which involves ranking banks in terms of their impact separately on the non-financial and financial sectors of the economy, followed by aggregation and ranking of the results. The study is based on the analysis of theoretical and methodological approaches to the identification of systemically important banks and was performed in relation to the Russian economy. It includes an analysis of the financial statements of commercial banks and the definition of indicators characterizing their cross-sectoral impact on the economy. We have elaborated criteria and evaluation scales for quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the systemically important banks with the allocation of significance levels. On the basis of the developed criteria, we analyzed the systemically important Russian banks for the non- financial and financial sectors, and for the economy as a whole. Further, we gave the quantitative and qualitative assessment of the systemically important Russian banks and provided a comparative analysis of the results with the officially established list of systemically important banks in the Russian Federation. The criteria and evaluation scales proposed in the study allow increasing the objectivity of the banks’ classification as systemically important ones. At the same time, they create a platform for using a proportional approach to regulating the activities of systemically important banks. Proposed in the study the criteria for identification of the systemically important banks, with regard to their impact on certain sectors of the economy, are universal and can be used in different countries. Исследуются актуальные теоретические и методологические подходы к идентификации системно значимых банков с учетом специфики национальных экономик.Цель исследования — разработка критериев идентификации системно значимых банков на национальном уровне, создающих платформу для использования пропорционального подхода к регулированию их деятельности.Используется кросс-секторальный подход, который опирается на применение методов индукции и кластерного анализа и предполагает ранжирование банков по уровню их влияния отдельно на нефинансовый и финансовый секторы экономики с последующим агрегированием и ранжированием полученных результатов. Исследование построено на анализе теоретических и методологических подходов к идентификации системно значимых банков и выполнено применительно к российской экономике. Оно включает в себя анализ финансовой отчетности коммерческих банков и определение показателей, характеризующих их кросс-секторальное влияние на экономику.Разработаны критерии и оценочные шкалы для количественной и качественной характеристики системной значимости банков с выделением уровней значимости. На основе разработанных критериев выполнен анализ системной значимости российских банков для нефинансового и финансового секторов и экономики в целом. Дана количественная и качественная оценка системной значимости российских банков. Проведен сравнительный анализ полученных результатов с официально установленным перечнем системно значимых банков Российской Федерации.Предлагаемые в исследовании критерии и оценочные шкалы позволяют повысить объективность отнесения банков к системно значимым. Одновременно они создают платформу для использования пропорционального подхода к регулированию деятельности системно значимых банков. Предложенные в исследовании критерии идентификации системно значимых банков с учетом их влияния на отдельные секторы экономики имеют универсальный характер и могут быть использованы в разных странах.

Suggested Citation

  • G. Gospodarchuk G. & E. Suchkova O. & Г. Господарчук Г. & Е. Сучкова О., 2018. "Совершенствование Критериев Идентификации Системно Значимых Банков На Основе Кросс-Секторального Подхода // The Improvement Of Criteria For Identification Of Systemically Important Banks Based On Cros," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 22(4), pages 18-37.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2018:i:4:p:18-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/731/500.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George Sheldon & Martin Maurer, 1998. "Interbank Lending and Systemic Risk: An Empirical Analysis for Switzerland," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 134(IV), pages 685-704, December.
    2. Jacob Kleinow & Tobias Nell & Silvia Rogler & Andreas Horsch, 2014. "The value of being systemically important: event study on regulatory announcements for banks," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(24), pages 1585-1604, December.
    3. Zlatuse Komarkova & Vaclav Hausenblas & Jan Frait, 2012. "How To Identify Systemically Important Financial Institutions," Occasional Publications - Chapters in Edited Volumes, in: CNB Financial Stability Report 2011/2012, chapter 0, pages 100-111, Czech National Bank.
    4. Molyneux, Philip & Schaeck, Klaus & Zhou, Tim Mi, 2014. "‘Too systemically important to fail’ in banking – Evidence from bank mergers and acquisitions," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(PB), pages 258-282.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michal Skorepa & Jakub Seidler, 2015. "Capital buffers based on banks’ domestic systemic importance: selected issues," Journal of Financial Economic Policy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(3), pages 207-220, August.
    2. Mistrulli, Paolo Emilio, 2011. "Assessing financial contagion in the interbank market: Maximum entropy versus observed interbank lending patterns," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 1114-1127, May.
    3. Kanno, Masayasu, 2020. "Interconnectedness and systemic risk in the US CDS market," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    4. Zhao, Na, 2019. "Managing interactive collaborative mega project supply chains under infectious risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 275-286.
    5. Lara Mónica Machado Fernandes & Maria Rosa Borges, 2013. "Interbank Linkages and Contagion Risk in the Portuguese Banking System," Working Papers Department of Economics 2013/23, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa.
    6. Helmut Elsinger & Alfred Lehar & Martin Summer, 2006. "Risk Assessment for Banking Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(9), pages 1301-1314, September.
    7. Adam Kucera & Milan Szabo, 2021. "Interconnectedness and contagion in the Czech financial system," Occasional Publications - Chapters in Edited Volumes,, Czech National Bank.
    8. Fathin Faizah Said, 2017. "Global Banking on the Financial Network Modelling: Sectorial Analysis," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 49(2), pages 227-253, February.
    9. Cappelletti, Giuseppe & Mistrulli, Paolo Emilio, 2023. "The role of credit lines and multiple lending in financial contagion and systemic events," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    10. Ebrahimi Kahou, Mahdi & Lehar, Alfred, 2017. "Macroprudential policy: A review," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 92-105.
    11. Sandro Brusco & Giuseppe Lopomo & Leslie M. Marx, 2011. "The Economics of Contingent Re-auctions," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 3(2), pages 165-193, May.
    12. Domenico Di Gangi & Fabrizio Lillo & Davide Pirino, 2015. "Assessing systemic risk due to fire sales spillover through maximum entropy network reconstruction," Papers 1509.00607, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2018.
    13. Ana Babus, 2016. "The formation of financial networks," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 47(2), pages 239-272, May.
    14. Cheng, Xian & Zhao, Haichuan, 2019. "Modeling, analysis and mitigation of contagion in financial systems," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 281-292.
    15. Degryse, H.A. & Nguyen, G., 2004. "Interbank Exposures : An Empirical Examination of Systemic Risk in the Belgian Banking System," Discussion Paper 2004-4, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    16. Marko Krznar, 2009. "Contagion Risk in the Croatian Banking System," Working Papers 20, The Croatian National Bank, Croatia.
    17. Nier, Erlend & Yang, Jing & Yorulmazer, Tanju & Alentorn, Amadeo, 2007. "Network models and financial stability," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 2033-2060, June.
    18. Galos, Peter & Soramäki, Kimmo, 2005. "Systemic risk in alternative payment system designs," Working Paper Series 508, European Central Bank.
    19. Michele Manna & Carmela Iazzetta, 2009. "The topology of the interbank market: developments in Italy since 1990," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 711, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    20. repec:cnb:ocpubv:rb12/2 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Accominotti, Olivier & Lucena-Piquero, Delio & Ugolini, Stefano, 2023. "Intermediaries’ substitutability and financial network resilience: A hyperstructure approach," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2018:i:4:p:18-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://financetp.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.