IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/financ/y2017i3p61-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Некоторые Проблемы Теории Экономического Роста // Some Problems Of The Economic Growth Theory

Author

Listed:
  • O. Sukharev S.

    (the Russian Academy of Sciences)

  • О. Сухарев С.

    (Российская академия наук)

Abstract

The subject of the study is the resource approach to the economic growth policy including theoretical aspects of the economic growth model. A recession is usually replaced by the growth dynamics, and the economy’s recovery from the recession requires justification of government policy measures that not only help overcome the crisis, but also lead the economy to sustainable growth at a given pace. The study is concerned with the assessment of aggregate type models within the framework of the resource-factor approach and the impact of investments and consumer spendings on the economic growth rate at the theoretical (model) and empirical levels of analysis. The modern technological level and the type of “technological function” ensure not only the ability of the economy to grow in the current regime but also provide the basis for long-term growth prospects. The technological choice determines the extensive or intensive types of economic growth. The relationship between the rates of creating a new resource and diversion of an existing one to ensure the growth has been determined. The more intensive is the diversion of the resource from available facilities as well as the higher is the interest rate, the lower are the opportunities for creating a new resource and more modest are growth opportunities through the development of a new resource. It is shown that the change in the technological level to ensure the growth of the economic system requires a greater change in consumer spendings. Concerning the economic policy of investment promotion in Russia, it is shown that in the first phase of the recovery, it is advisable not so much to increase the amount of investments as stimulate aggregate consumption and restore the income level. Therefore, the consumption crisis must be eliminated, and since economic growth can occur not through investments (as it was in Russia before the 2015 crisis), it is necessary to seek a growth policy through investments considering their impact on the technological parameters of the economic system. Besides, the increase in the savings rate is not an end in itself for the establishment of the economic growth policy, it is, rather, a resultant parameter that should be taken as such when making macroeconomic decisions. Предметом исследования стал ресурсный подход к организации экономического роста - теоретические аспекты модели роста экономики. Ростовая динамика обычно сменяет рецессию, а выход экономики из рецессии требует обоснования мероприятий правительственной политики, способствующих не только преодолению кризиса, но и выводу экономики на траекторию устойчивого роста заданного темпа. Исследование касается оценки моделей агрегатного типа в рамках применяемого ресурсно-факторного подхода, а также влияния инвестиций и потребительских расходов на темп экономического роста на теоретическом (модельном) и эмпирическом уровне анализа. Современный уровень технологичности и вид «технологической функции» обеспечивают не только способность роста экономики в текущем режиме, но и долгосрочные перспективы роста. Технологический выбор предопределяет экстенсивный или интенсивный тип экономического роста. Определено, как связаны скорости создания нового и отвлечения имеющегося ресурса для обеспечения роста. Чем интенсивнее идет отвлечение ресурса от имеющихся возможностей либо заимствование, а также чем выше процентная ставка, тем ниже возможности по созданию нового ресурса и скромны возможности роста за счет освоения нового ресурса. Показано, что изменение технологического уровня для роста экономической системы требует большего изменения потребительских расходов. Относительно экономической политики стимулирования инвестиций в России показано, что на первой фазе выхода из рецессии потребуется не столько наращение величины инвестиций, сколько стимулирование совокупного потребления и восстановление уровня доходов граждан. Поэтому кризис потребления требует элиминации. А с учетом того, что компонента валового потребления занимает самую большую долю в структуре ВВП РФ, стимулирование потребления через смягчение денежно-кредитной и бюджетной политики с мерами противодействия инфляции на уровне роста затрат и экономической структуры (регулирование естественных монополий) позволит сложить первую фазу политики экономического роста в России. Экономический рост России перед кризисом 2015 г. происходил не за счет инвестиций, а за счет потребительских, правительственных расходов и чистого экспорта. Теперь нужно искать новые факторы роста за счет инвестиций, рассматривая их влияние на технологические параметры экономики. Кроме того, повышение нормы накопления не является самоцелью для организации политики экономического роста, скорее данный параметр выступает результирующим и соответственно должен восприниматься при принятии макроэкономических решений.

Suggested Citation

  • O. Sukharev S. & О. Сухарев С., 2017. "Некоторые Проблемы Теории Экономического Роста // Some Problems Of The Economic Growth Theory," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 21(3), pages 61-74.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2017:i:3:p:61-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/362/289.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert M. Solow, 1994. "Perspectives on Growth Theory," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(1), pages 45-54, Winter.
    2. Robert M. Solow, 2007. "The last 50 years in growth theory and the next 10," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 23(1), pages 3-14, Spring.
    3. Richard Nelson, 2007. "Economic Development from the Perspective of Evolutionary Economic Theory," Globelics Working Paper Series 2007-02, Globelics - Global Network for Economics of Learning, Innovation, and Competence Building Systems, Aalborg University, Department of Business and Management.
    4. Richard Nelson, 2008. "Economic Development from the Perspective of Evolutionary Economic Theory," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 9-21.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oleg Sukharev, 2016. "Economic Growth of a Rapidly Developing Economy: Theoretical Formulation," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(2), pages 359-370.
    2. O. S. Sukharev, 2019. "Economic growth and technological renewal: Structural dynamics," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 20(2), pages 30-54, May.
    3. O. Sukharev S. & О. Сухарев С., 2018. "Финансирование Развития: Решение Структурно-Распределительной Задачи // Development Financing: The Solution Of The Structural-Distributive Problem," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 22(3), pages 64-83.
    4. Wignaraja, Ganeshan, 2008. "FDI and Innovation as Drivers of Export Behaviour: Firm-level Evidence from East Asia," MERIT Working Papers 2008-061, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    5. Camelia Moraru & Romana Emilia Cramarenco, 2014. "Methodological Diversity In The Study Of Innovation. The Place And Role Of Innovative Industrial Clusters Research Methodology," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 8(1), pages 54-68, JUNE.
    6. Lee, Keun & Juma, Calestous & Mathews, John, 2014. "Innovation capabilities for sustainable development in Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series 062, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Jeon, Heesang, 2015. "Knowledge and Contemporary Capitalism in Light of Marx's Value Theory," Thesis Commons g5njk, Center for Open Science.
    8. Yury N. Vorobyov & Elena I. Vorobyova, 2019. "Investment potential of Russia’s economy: Opportunities for financing the development," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 20(1), pages 41-60, March.
    9. Rajah Rasiah, 2011. "Book Review: The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008 by Paul Krugman, New York: Norton, 2009, 191 pp," Institutions and Economies (formerly known as International Journal of Institutions and Economies), Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Malaya, vol. 3(2), pages 387-395, July.
    10. Henrekson Magnus, 2017. "Taxation of Swedish Firm Owners: The Great Reversal from the 1970s to the 2010s," Nordic Tax Journal, Sciendo, vol. 2017(1), pages 26-46, January.
    11. Rajah Rasiah & Nazia Nazeer, 2015. "The State of Manufacturing in Pakistan," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 20(Special E), pages 205-224, September.
    12. Jinfeng Wang & Xuhua Liu & Hongyan Chen, 2011. "Construction of a Cities Evolution Tree, with Applications," ERSA conference papers ersa10p1360, European Regional Science Association.
    13. Renat Butabaev, 2015. "There is no growth without change - policy implications for transition economies," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 11(1), pages 69-84.
    14. Nooteboom Bart, 2014. "In What Sense do Firms Evolve?," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 234(2-3), pages 185-209, April.
    15. Geert Duysters & Myriam Cloodt & Wilfred Schoenmakers & Jojo Jacob, 2015. "Internationalisation Efforts of Chinese and Indian Companies: An Empirical Perspective," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 106(2), pages 169-186, April.
    16. Yangjie Huang & Sihui Li & Xiyuan Xiang & Leilei Huang, 2024. "Analyzing the configuration of the National Innovation System for Innovation Capability: evidence from Global Innovation Index reports," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Guennif, Samira & Ramani, Shyama V., 2012. "Explaining divergence in catching-up in pharma between India and Brazil using the NSI framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 430-441.
    18. Shulin Gu & John O. Adeoti & Ana Célia Castro & Jeffrey Orozco & Rafael Díaz, 2012. "The Agro-food Sector in Catching-up Countries: A Comparative Study of Four Cases," Chapters, in: Franco Malerba & Richard R. Nelson (ed.), Economic Development as a Learning Process, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Rajah Rasiah, 2011. "Epilogue: Implications from industrializing East Asia's innovation and learning experiences," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 257-262, April.
    20. Raymond Elikplim Kofinti & Emmanuel Orkoh & Raymond Boadi Frempong & Samuel Kobina Annim, 2023. "Firms' digital investment and resilience to shocks: Evidence from the COVID‐19 pandemic in Ghana," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(7), pages 2157-2176, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2017:i:3:p:61-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://financetp.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.